Return to search

Avalia??o cl?nica de restaura??es classe v restauradas com a t?cnica direta e semidireta

Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-06-15T11:26:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
468076 - Texto Completo.pdf: 1121444 bytes, checksum: 65fc7c05be36d73bf2d8b7f5853d6a61 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-15T11:26:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
468076 - Texto Completo.pdf: 1121444 bytes, checksum: 65fc7c05be36d73bf2d8b7f5853d6a61 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-11-29 / OBJECTIVE : The objective of this study was to evaluate in 6 months Class V restorations clinically with composite resin ( Glacier ) and glass ionomer cement ( Riva selfcure ) with the direct technique and restorations semidirect technique, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement ( SeT ) and total etching cement ( RelyX ARC ) . MATERIAL AND METHODS : One hundred and twenty restorations were performed by a single operator in
30 patients . Each patient received a composite resin restoration ( RGLA ) , glass ionomer cement ( RVA ) , ceromer cemented with RelyX ARC ( RARC ) , and cemented with SeT (RSET ) . After 6 months, the evaluation was performed using the USPHS criteria for the presence of restoration, marginal integrity , color and presence of secondary caries .
RESULTS : The results were obtained through statistical analysis of generalized linear
mixed model and showed that only the restorations cemented with SeT were statistical
difference , with significant loss of restorations . No patient had secondary caries after 6 months of evaluation . The marginal integrity and color were not significantly different between groups . CONCLUSION : We conclude that restorations cement with self-adhesive SeT failed . Thus the direct restorations had a better behavior than the semidirect restorations. However semidirects restorations cemented with Adper Single Bond 2 + RelyX ARC and total etching presented along with the RVA group the highest
predictive average. / OBJETIVO: O Objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar clinicamente no per?odo de 6 meses restaura??es classe V em resina composta (Glacier) e cimento de ion?mero de vidro (Riva selfcure) pela t?cnica direta, e restaura??es com cer?mero pela t?cnica semidireta cimentadas com cimento resinoso autoadesivo (SeT) e com condicionamento total (RelyX ARC). MATERIAL E M?TODO: Cento e vinte restaura??es foram realizadas por um ?nico operador em 30 pacientes. Cada paciente recebeu uma restaura??o de resina composta (RGLA), Cimento de ion?mero de vidro (RVA), cer?mero cimentada com RelyX ARC (RARC), e cer?mero cimentada com SeT (RSET). Ap?s 6 meses as avalia??es foram realizadas atrav?s dos crit?rios do USPHS modificado quanto ? presen?a da restaura??o, integridade marginal, descolora??o marginal e presen?a de c?rie secund?ria.
RESULTADOS: Os resultados foram obtidos atrav?s da an?lise estat?stica de modelo linear misto generalizado e mostraram que somente as restaura??es de cer?mero cimentadas com SeT apresentaram diferen?a estat?stica, com perda significativa das restaura??es. Nenhum paciente apresentou c?rie secund?ria ap?s os 6 meses de avalia??o. A integridade marginal e descolora??o marginal n?o apresentaram diferen?a estat?stica entre os grupos. CONCLUS?O: Conclu?mos que as restaura??es realizadas com cimento autoadesivo SeT falharam. Desta forma as restaura??es diretas tiveram um comportamento melhor que as restaura??es semidiretas. Todavia as restaura??es semidiretas cimentadas com Adper Single Bond 2 + RelyX ARC e condicionamento ?cido total apresentaram junto com o grupo RVA a maior m?dia preditiva.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6132
Date29 November 2013
CreatorsRodrigues, Patr?cia Silva Hamester
ContributorsBurnett Junior, Luiz Henrique
PublisherPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Odontologia, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Odontologia
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Relation-8096554818733665164, 600, 600, 600, 4673435736271820140, -2070498469879244349

Page generated in 0.002 seconds