生技產業乃二十一世紀的十大重要產業之第一位,而台灣雄厚電子產業的發展根基,非常適合發展生物科技領域中之醫療器材產業,而電子醫療器材產品與一般電子產品最大的不同處,在於產品開發期較長,尤其在驗證與確效上的作業最為繁複,往往臨床驗證所花費的資源比實際開發設計工作更多,除少數家用電子醫療器材產品外,皆具少量多樣之產品特性,以台灣在電子產業研發技術的實力,加上業界快速應變能力,公、私部門若能投入更多資源,則產業榮景可期。
基於產業特性之不同,歷年來有許多有關作業基礎成本制產業別適用性之研究,但卻少有對醫療器材產業之適用有深入的研究。因此本研究將經由個案實例,建構與導入作業基礎成本制度,確認作業基礎成本制度是否適用於醫療器材產業,並探討醫療器材產業研發部門導入作業基礎成本制度時之相關事項。
本研究擬以國內某一上市櫃之醫療電子廠商為研究對象,以個案研究之方式,探討以下主題:
1. 作業基礎成本制度是否適用於醫療器材產業。
2. 為個案公司研發管理流程建構作業基礎成本制度。
3. 經由建構與導入作業基礎成本制度嘗試分析找出最佳動因之方法與相關應注意事項。
4. 經由建構與導入作業基礎成本制度分析動因選定與資料收集效率之間的平衡取捨。 / Biotechnology is at the apex of the top-ten industries list of the 21st century. The profound foundation of electronics in Taiwan is suitable for the development of medical equipment industry in the field of biotechnology. Long product development time is the trait that separates electronic medical products from electronics (consumer, IT ,etc) , especially, the complicated and lengthy validation and certification process. The process of clinical testing consumes more resources in comparison to actual product development and design. Except for homecare device, medical equipment is small in volume and big in diversity. In addition to R&D capability and quick response to market, Taiwan’s electronics industry will be able to achieve more if additional resources are invested.
Each industry is unique in its own way. There are many studies furnished on activity-based costing system of various industries ,but they are lacking for medical equipment industry. It is the attempt of this research to construct and introduce activity-based costing system with a case study in order to confirm whether the activity-based costing system is applicable for medical equipment industry and what the influences of activity-based costing system on medical equipment industry.
1. Whether the activity-based costing system is applicable for medical equipment industry or not?
2. Construct an activity-based costing system for R&D management procedure of the subject in this research.
3. Try to analyze and seek for the best driver by constructing and introducing an activity-based costing system.
4. Try to analyze the balance between driver selection and data collection efficiency by constructing and introducing an activity-based costing system.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0094932411 |
Creators | 劉志平, Liu,Chih Ping |
Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
Language | 中文 |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0012 seconds