Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) is a popular investment strategy for purchasing equity securities. Even though previous research shows that DCA is somehow inefficient, it has remained a default strategy widely recommended by financial advisors worldwide. Using this starting point, this thesis empirically investigates and compares DCA with Lump-Sum Investing (LSI) through a replicative approach. We use a simulation to analyze the strategies performance on the Swedish Equity Market. The evaluation is conducted from both a traditional and behavioral finance framework. In line with Leggio and Lien (2001), whom we replicate, our results indicate LSI being a superior strategy for both mean-variance and loss-averse investors. Hence, we argue that LSI should not be forfeit as a potential strategy when entering the Swedish market. An evaluation of the two strategies should help Swedish investors to make better-informed decisions about whether to use DCA or LSI.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-433867 |
| Date | January 2021 |
| Creators | Eriksson, Ludwig, Fransson, Philip |
| Publisher | Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds