Return to search

Characteristics of Effective Mentoring in a Formal Mentoring Setting

A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted to determine the perceived
levels of effectiveness and barriers for a successful mentoring relationship between
mentors and mentees. Specifically, this study explored the formal mentoring
relationships within Texas AgriLife Extension's Mentoring Program. Research was
conducted on mentoring relationships from mentor and mentee perspectives to determine
how they perceived the relationships' effectiveness, which may serve as a model for
further research.
The population for this longitudinal study was mentors and mentees in a formal
mentoring relationship between the years of 2004 and 2008 within Texas AgriLife
Extension Service. One hundred-six mentoring relationships were examined over a five
year period. The data were gathered from an open-ended evaluation instrument
administered at the end of the one-year mentoring relationship.
Wells, (1997) served as the conceptual framework for this study. Wells's model
is based on the nine roles of value-creating order, inspiring action, and improving
performance-and was used to identify skills that could build professional capacity for a mentor and mentee. The findings of this study indicated that mentors and mentees
perceived the formal mentoring program to be effective in sharing knowledge, resources,
and experiences. Mentors and mentees indicated that the barriers of time, distance,
differences, and work load existed and the relationship could have been improved if
barriers were minimized. The perceived characteristics that emerged for an effective
mentoring relationship were trusting, encouraging, and leadership.
Recommendations were made that researchers should continue to look at training
and processes for mentors and mentees preparing for a mentoring relationship.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7294
Date2009 December 1900
CreatorsLuckey, Rebecca Ann
ContributorsRosser, Manda H.
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Thesis, text
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.002 seconds