In the fall of 1999, a coalition, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the National Latino Media Council (NLMC), American Indians in Film & Television, and the National Asian-Pacific Media Coalition, threatened to boycott the major broadcast networks when their fall lineups were announced with no leads of color and few people of color in supporting roles. As a result of the protest, the four large broadcast networks came forward with diversity initiatives that would increase the number of people of color both in front of and behind the scenes. Using political economy of media and critical race theory, this research examines the effectiveness of the diversity initiatives created by the broadcast networks to address the lack of representation of people of color in front of and behind the scenes. After fifteen years, the pressure from the multi-ethnic coalition has dwindled and, though there are examples of television programs with not only a diverse staff but also women and people of color in decision making roles, the overall diversity numbers still leave a lot to be desired. A study found that the total percentage of writers of color in broadcasting and cable is 15.6 percent. The results for directors were just as dismal with 16 percent representation. Historical critical analysis reveals that efforts made by broadcast networks as early as the 1940s claimed to focus on increasing representation of people of color, primarily African Americans, in front of and behind the camera. Internal memos showed however that, while individual efforts were made, overall the networks were only providing lip service. Interviews revealed that current diversity initiatives are instrumental in getting participants into entry level positions, but do not help them move up into decision making positions. Many found, in fact, that the stigma of being a diverse candidate sometimes hurt their mobility. In broadcasting, despite the diversity initiatives, much more work needs to be done. / A Dissertation submitted to the School of Communication in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Spring Semester, 2014. / May 2, 2014. / Broadcasting, Critical Race Theory, Diversity, Political Economy of Media / Includes bibliographical references. / Jennifer M. Proffitt, Professor Directing Dissertation; Valliere Richard, University Representative; Stephen McDowell, Committee Member; Davis Houck, Committee Member.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_185266 |
| Contributors | Hunter, Leah P. (authoraut), Proffitt, Jennifer M. (professor directing dissertation), Richard, Valliere (university representative), McDowell, Stephen (committee member), Houck, Davis (committee member), School of Communication (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution) |
| Publisher | Florida State University, Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, text |
| Format | 1 online resource, computer, application/pdf |
| Rights | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds