Return to search

Quanto de quê? : o debate teórico e os estudos de democratização

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciência Política, 2006. / Submitted by Érika Rayanne Carvalho (carvalho.erika@ymail.com) on 2009-10-14T00:23:43Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERT_Leonardo Barreto.pdf: 412319 bytes, checksum: f36bf062525da4245feed12d8e7b64ae (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luanna Maia(luanna@bce.unb.br) on 2011-01-26T12:17:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERT_Leonardo Barreto.pdf: 412319 bytes, checksum: f36bf062525da4245feed12d8e7b64ae (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2011-01-26T12:17:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERT_Leonardo Barreto.pdf: 412319 bytes, checksum: f36bf062525da4245feed12d8e7b64ae (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006 / Essa dissertação contextualiza os estudos de democratização dentro do debate teórico das tradições procedimental e participativa de democracia. Objetiva-se verificar qual é o paradigma majoritário e a influência de escolas distintas na construção das medidas de democracia. O trabalho realiza a discussão teórica sobre o modelo procedimental a partir das contribuições de Schumpeter e Weber, enquanto a opção participativa ressalta Rousseau e Pateman. Analisa-se a presença dessas duas visões na ciência política e nos estudos de avaliação e monitoramento das "democracias novas" realizadas pelos institutos Latinobarômento, Freedom House e PNUD. _______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT / This report puts the studies on democratization in the context of theoretical debate upon procedural and participatory democracy tradition. The purpose of the report is to find out which is the majority paradigm and the extent to which different schools affect the building up of democratic procedures. The way of achieving those findings consists of a theoretical comparison between procedural and participatory models. The relevant information for this study came from the scientific achievements of Schumpeter and Weber and from Rosseau and Pateman respectively. This study offers an analysis of how both procedures are found in the scope of Political Science, as well as in process of the evaluation and follow up of “new democracies” studies carried out by the Latinobarômento Institute, the Freedom House Institute, and UNDP.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/6607
Date January 2006
CreatorsBarreto, Leonardo
ContributorsAvelar, Lúcia Mercês de
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB, instname:Universidade de Brasília, instacron:UNB
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds