Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-10T15:20:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
SamaraSirdeniaDuarteDeRosarioBelmiro_TESE.pdf: 3565404 bytes, checksum: d5824fbb2d942d69130cae7c5f22d9e5 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-11T15:42:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
SamaraSirdeniaDuarteDeRosarioBelmiro_TESE.pdf: 3565404 bytes, checksum: d5824fbb2d942d69130cae7c5f22d9e5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-11T15:42:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
SamaraSirdeniaDuarteDeRosarioBelmiro_TESE.pdf: 3565404 bytes, checksum: d5824fbb2d942d69130cae7c5f22d9e5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-06-30 / Objetiva-se buscar evid?ncia de validade do instrumento para avalia??o de necessidades em sa?de de pessoas com defici?ncia f?sica, auditiva e visual. Trata-se de um estudo metodol?gico para desenvolvimento, valida??o de conte?do, valida??o sem?ntica e de apar?ncia de um instrumento avaliativo. O processo de constru??o e valida??o segue os preceitos de Pasquali, seguindo as etapas do polo te?rico, atrav?s de duas fases: 1) identifica??o das defini??es constitutivas e operacionais do constructo e elabora??o dos itens que compuseram o instrumento denominado Instrumento de Avalia??o de Necessidades de Sa?de de Pessoas com Defici?ncia F?sica, Auditiva e Visual (IANC-PcDFAV), atrav?s de revis?o integrativa da literatura, realizada no primeiro trimestre de 2015 nas bases de dados CINAHL, MEDLINE, LILACS e SCOPUS; experi?ncia dos pesquisadores; e na Taxonomia das Necessidades de Sa?de de Matsumoto e Cec?lio; 2) A an?lise te?rica dos itens, realizada no per?odo de setembro de 2015 a maio de 2016, atrav?s de duas etapas. Etapa 1 ? valida??o de conte?do, atrav?s de t?cnica Delphi. Nesta etapa, realizou-se busca por meio da plataforma Lattes, para identificar profissionais da ?rea da sa?de com expertise que atuassem como ju?zes do instrumento. A amostra foi de 33 especialistas na fase Delphi 1 e 18 para a Delphi 2. Para a coleta de dados submeteu-se, via online, o formul?rio aos especialistas. Realizou-se a an?lise adotando o ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do (IVC) > 0,80 e Alpha de Cronbach > 0,80. Utilizou-se o teste de Mann-Whitney para investigar as diferen?as entre as fases Delphi 1 e 2 com p > 0,05. Etapa 2 ? A valida??o sem?ntica e de apar?ncia utilizou amostragem n?o probabil?stica por conveni?ncia com oito PcDs, sendo dois com defici?ncia f?sica, quatro com defici?ncia auditiva e dois com defici?ncia visual cadastradas em tr?s institui??es de apoio a PcDs em Mossor?/RN. Foram aplicados tr?s instrumentos: o IANS-PcDFAV, o Question?rio DISABKIDS? - Impress?o geral, e o Question?rio DISABKIDS? - Impress?es espec?ficas. A an?lise deu-se por estat?stica descritiva. Consideraram-se os princ?pios da Resolu??o 466/2012. No processo de valida??o do conte?do, na primeira rodada Delphi verificou-se que cinco itens da dimens?o dados sociodemogr?ficos e dois itens da dimens?o condi??es de vida n?o alcan?aram o ?ndice da validade de conte?do estabelecido. Nos demais itens ocorreu concord?ncia, com IVC variando de 0,82 a 1. Na segunda rodada, depois de acatadas as sugest?es dos especialistas, todos os itens avaliados atingiram ?ndices excelentes. Apresentaram-se diferen?as significativas nas dimens?es dados sociodemogr?ficos, condi??es de vida e no dom?nio 1. No que diz respeito ? m?dia dos requisitos de avalia??o, todos os itens obtiveram m?dias melhores na segunda avalia??o, com signific?ncia estat?stica (p=
0,026) no requisito utilidade/pertin?ncia e na avalia??o geral do instrumento (p= 0,031). O alpha de Cronbach foi de 0,884 na fase Delphi 1 e 0,825 na fase Delphi 2. No que concerne ? valida??o sem?ntica e de apar?ncia, o instrumento foi avaliado como importante e os itens do instrumento foram considerados f?ceis de compreender. As respostas geraram modifica??es na constru??o dos itens do instrumento. Assim, se aceita a hip?tese alternativa do estudo, em que IVC, consist?ncia interna e valida??o sem?ntica geral alcan?aram valores acima de 0,80. O instrumento proposto apresenta valores satisfat?rios de validade e consist?ncia interna, servindo como guia para a avalia??o das necessidades de sa?de de pessoas com defici?ncia f?sica, auditiva e/ou visual. / The objective is to seek evidence of validity of the instrument for the assessment of needs in health for people with physical disabilities, auditory and/or visual. This is a methodological study for development, content validation, validation semantics and appearance of an instrument of evaluative dimension. The process of construction and validation follows the precepts of Pasquali, following the steps of the polo theoretician, through two phases: 1) Identification of the settings pane and the operational construct and preparation of items that comprised the instrument called a tool for evaluation of health needs of people with physical disabilities, Auditory and Visual (IANC-PcDFAV), through integrative literature review performed in the first quarter of 2015 in databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, LILACS and SCOPUS; experience of researchers; and in the taxonomy of Health Needs Of Matsumoto and Cec?lio; 2) The theoretical analysis of the items held in the period from September 2015 to May 2016, through two steps. Step 1 - Validation of content through Delphi Technique. In this step, we search through the Lattes platform, to identify health care professionals with expertise who acted as judges of the instrument. The sample consisted of 33 experts in Delphi 1 and 18 for Delphi 2. For data collection submitted via online, the form of specialists. The analysis by adopting the Content Validity Index (CVI) > 0.80 and Cronbach's alpha > 0.80. The Mann-Whitney test was used to investigate the differences between phases Delphi 1 and 2 with p > 0.05. Step 2 - Validation semantics and appearance we used random non-probabilistic by convenience with eight PWD, being two with physical disabilities, four with hearing disabilities and two with visual disabilities enrolled in three institutions to support the PWD in Mossoro/RN. There were applied three instruments: the ians-PcDFAV, the questionnaire DISABKIDS? - overall impression, and the questionnaire DISABKIDS? - specific prints. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics. They considered themselves the principles of Resolution 466/2012. In the process of validation of the content there was established in the first Delphi, it showed that five items of the scale demographic data and two items of the scale living conditions did not reach the index of content validity. The remaining items were agreed, with CVI ranging from 0.82 to 1. In the second round, once accepted the suggestions of the experts, all items assessed have achieved excellence. It showed significant differences in the dimensions of demographic data, living conditions and in domain 1. With respect to the average requirements for evaluation, all items obtained medium best in the second evaluation, with statistical significance (p= 0.026) in requirement usefulness/appropriateness and general assessment of the instrument (p= 0.031). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.884 in Delphi 1 and 0.825 in Delphi 2. With regard to the semantic validation and appearance, the instrument was evaluated as important and the items of the instrument were considered easy to understand. The answers generated changes in the construction of the items of the instrument. Thus, it is accepted the alternative hypothesis of the study, in which CVI, internal consistency and validation general semantics reached values above 0.80. The proposed instrument presents satisfactory values of validity and internal consistency, serving as a guide for the assessment of health needs of people with physical disabilities, auditory and/or visual.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21616 |
| Date | 30 June 2016 |
| Creators | Belmiro, S?mara Sird?nia Duarte de Ros?rio |
| Contributors | 04960360330, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9242337504601387, Torres, Gilson de Vasconcelos, 51326728415, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1944547152815226, Costa, Isabelle Katherinne Fernandes, 06605883403, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5903265312273525, Coura, Alexsandro Silva, 06483617488, Fran?a, In?cia S?tiro Xavier de, 09863923400, Miranda, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ENFERMAGEM, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds