Return to search

A Comparison of Sight Word and Phonics Contingencies in the Remediation of Oral Reading and Comprehension

A comparison of contingent word and phonics drilling exercises on oral reading errors was made and the effects of a work skipping contingency on reading comprehension were examined. Five learning disabled elementary school children served as subjects. Reading comprehension increased from 30 to 50% over baseline, while subjects progressed an average of two years through a reading series. Subjects responded differentially to the two drills on oral reading errors, but the combined effects of the drills produced a 50% average reduction in errors. Pre- and post-tests of reading achievement showed increases in reading grade levels ranging from .8 to 1.5 years during the 10 week, 30 session study. Results supported the efficacy of a behavioral approach to reading remediation.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc504350
Date08 1900
CreatorsHuffine, John Harold
ContributorsMartin, Sander, 1939-, Johnson, Douglas A., Peek, Leon A.
PublisherNorth Texas State University
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formatv, 51 leaves: ill., Text
CoverageUnited States - Texas - Dallas County, United States - Texas - Tarrant County - Fort Worth
RightsPublic, Huffine, John Harold, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds