Mechanical stimulation plays a crucial role in promoting cell differentiation. However, applying physical force directly to cells requires complex equipment and a sterile environment, posing challenges. To overcome this, stimuli-responsive biomaterials or 4D scaffolds can serve as an alternative platform for mechanical stimulation. These scaffolds, fabricated using advanced 3D printing techniques, can apply the necessary force to cells. To optimize their functionality, bioactive molecules or extracellular matrices can be incorporated or decorated on their surfaces. This thesis proposal focuses on developing a versatile material platform that allows customization through systematic composition adjustment and on-demand printing, while also offering surface modification capabilities. The primary objective is to create a novel cell carrier platform using thermo-responsive polymers. By manipulating the additive monomer compositions, we can finely adjust properties such as the transition temperature of the polymers, tailoring them to specific requirements. Furthermore, this platform will enable the fabrication of complex three-dimensional biomaterial structures with controllable porosity, a critical aspect of biomaterial design. Leveraging the capabilities of three-dimensional printing technology, we can program and achieve desired porosity levels in the printed structures, providing enhanced flexibility for biomaterial design. The development of thermo-responsive scaffolds involved three distinct stages aimed at designing an optimized platform that effectively operates within the physiological range while ensuring cell viability. One of the key challenges was to achieve a balance between thermoresponsive behavior and biocompatibility. In the initial stage, we investigated the interplay between a crosslinkable three-armed macromer (trimethylolpropane triacrylate-TMPTA) and various monomers (N-isopropylacrylamide-NiPAAm, methyl methacrylate-MMA, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate-DMAEA, 4-acryloylmorpholine-AMO) using thermally induced solution polymerization. NiPAAm, known for its thermoresponsive properties, was selected despite its limited biocompatibility. DMAEA was chosen to adjust the polymer network transition temperature by introducing cationic charge, which disrupts the coil-globule effect of PNiPAAm and provides cell adhesiveness of the composition. Additionally, the hydrophilic monomer AMO was incorporated to further fine-tune the polymeric network. We examined the behavior of these components within the physiological range and their integration into the PNiPAAm network, establishing significant correlations between the transition temperature of the polymer and the crosslinker and monomers in their soluble condition.
In the second stage of our research, we introduced photo-induced polymerization to enhance the crosslinking ratio. By utilizing this method, we successfully fabricated photo-polymerized mixtures (photoresists) into thermo-responsive discs, enabling us to study their swelling behavior between 37℃ and 25℃. Our findings revealed that the swelling behavior could be adjusted by varying the ratios of the crosslinker and monomers in the experimental groups. Through careful experimentation, we identified a suitable composition (3% w/w TMPTA, 80% w/w NiPAAm, 15% w/w DMAEA, 5% w/w AMO, and 4% w/w photo-initiator(PI)) that required minimal crosslinking incorporation while still retaining thermo-responsiveness. Furthermore, we conducted a preliminary biocompatibility study by fabricating the mixture into thin-films and cultivating them with L929 fibroblast cells.
In the third and final stage, we utilized the optimized formulations from the previous stage to build thermo-responsive 3D scaffolds using continuous Digital Light Processing (cDLP) printing. We investigated the effects of various parameters, such as curing time and monomer composition, on the swelling property of the scaffolds. Additionally, we introduced glycofurol (GF) as a photo-polymerization solvent, which allowed us to produce scaffolds with improved resolution and reduced printing time. The resulting optimized scaffolds, with a composition of 3% w/w TMPTA, 80% w/w NiPAAm, 15% w/w DMAEA, 5% w/w AMO, 4% w/w PI, and 10 seconds per layer, exhibited the desired thermo-responsiveness. To further understand the mechanical properties and thermal dependencies of these scaffolds, we conducted rheological analysis. This analysis helped establish a relationship between the mechanical properties of the scaffolds and their response to temperature changes.
To investigate the potential of cell stimulation through periodic changes, we conducted an experiment involving the seeding of L929 fibroblasts and C2C12 myoblasts on thermo-responsive 3D scaffolds. Our objective was to assess the ability of cells to proliferate on scaffolds with different compositions. Specifically, we examined two types of scaffolds: lattice scaffolds, characterized by a porous structure with a periodic network that enables cells to inhabit a 3D environment, and raft scaffolds, which feature a dense 3D structure designed for cells to reside on the surface for observation and evaluation. The lattice scaffolds were composed of ≥2% w/w DMAEA, while the raft scaffolds consisted of ≥5% w/w DMAEA. To evaluate cell proliferation, we conducted direct contact experiments and employed live/dead assays, subjecting the scaffolds to temperature switching conditions at 31℃ and 37℃. These experimental setups aimed to provide insights into the response and behavior of cells in the presence of thermo-responsive scaffolds with varying compositions. The results revealed favorable adhesion and spreading of the cells on the scaffolds. Interestingly, in our dynamic temperature experiment, we observed that myoblasts seeded on the scaffolds exhibited both proliferation and spreading, whereas myoblasts subjected to constant-temperature conditions did not show the same behavior. This suggests that the expansion and contraction of the scaffold, observed in previous experiments, may impact cell viability. Further investigation is needed to better understand this phenomenon. Additionally, we enhanced cell adhesiveness of the scaffolds by impregnating the scaffolds with poly-L-lysine and tested them with hASCs (human adipose-derived stem cells). Significant differences were observed between scaffolds with and without poly-L-lysine, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed a thermo-responsive 3D scaffold that exhibits a transition temperature within the physiological range, ensuring cell survival, and provides mechanical stimulation to the cells through the coil-globule effect without causing cell detachment. Among the formulations tested, the GF-printed formulation (3% w/w TMPTA, 80% w/w NiPAAm, 15% w/w DMAEA, 5% w/w AMO, and 4% w/w photo-initiator) with an exposure time of 10 seconds per layer showed the most promising results for cell cultivation under periodic changes in temperature, with a transition temperature of 36.3 °C ± 0.9 °C. Furthermore, we conducted direct cell contact experiments and confirmed the biocompatibility of the thermo-responsive macromer-based scaffolds. These findings demonstrate that this material platform offers a versatile and responsive material for mechanical stimulation of cells on three-dimensional scaffolds. These promising results suggest that this approach holds significant potential for tissue engineering applications and can be utilized to develop mechanical stimulation devices for various biomedical applications.:CHAPTER 1……………………..……………...…………………………..…4
Introduction
CHAPTER 2……………………..…………………………..……………….29
Material and Methods
CHAPTER 3……………………………………..…..……………………….52
Thermo-Responsive Polymer from Thermal Synthesis Studies
CHAPTER 4…………………………………..……………………………...70
An Adjustable Thermo-Responsive Polymer from Photo Synthesis
CHAPTER 5……………………………………………………………....….88
Fabrication of Thermo-Responsive Scaffolds from DLP Printing
CHAPTER 6…………………...…………………………………………....107
3D Scaffold Biocompatibility Studies
CHAPTER 7…………………...……………………………………………139
Discussions
CHAPTER 8…………………...……………………………………………161
Summery
APPENDIX…………………...………………………………………….…166
Bibliography, List of Publications, CV, Declaration of Authorship, Acknowledgements, Related publication
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:91723 |
| Date | 30 May 2024 |
| Creators | VEJJASILPA, KETPAT |
| Contributors | Schulz-Siegmund, Michaela, Hacker, Michael, Universität Leipzig |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010572 |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds