Miniaturization is a key technological approach in current times. The most prominent examples of miniaturization are personal computers and mobile phones, but we observe miniaturization in other aspects of life, with the most recent example being small portable corona test kits. In science a big part of miniaturization focuses on detectors: to make them portable, to make them integrable into bigger, multi-function systems or to enable detection of smaller and smaller samples. For many experimental techniques highly sensitive and compact devices are already available, one of the extreme examples being single photon detectors. Compared to that, miniaturization of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has still a long way to go in terms of both size and sensitivity.
Recently, the successful miniaturization of an NMR coil was presented: on top of a flat polymeric bilayer a metallic layout is patterned. In an aqueous solution, one polymer layer absorbs water and swells, which induces strain between the two polymeric layers. This strain is released by a self-rolling-up of the bilayer, and the metal layer transforms into a microcoil.
Such microcoils were successfully used for impedimetric measurements, as antennas, and as mentioned for NMR, but their performance in the latter was far from optimal. This thesis focuses on the optimization of rolled-up microcoils (RUMs) for NMR spectroscopy, with the goal to produce high-resolution and, most importantly, high-sensitivity microcoils. The performance of the microcoil can be expressed in three parameters, namely the spectral linewidth, the (normalized) limit of detection and the damping of a nutation curve, which was not a key parameter for this thesis. Both the microcoil design and the roll-up process have an influence on the quality of a RUM.
For an optimal roll-up process, the polymeric bilayer layout needed some adjustment. The rolling process itself was improved through an addition of supporting structures on top of the bilayer, which resulted in tightly rolled tubes with a well-defined diameter. The coil layout was selected from several simple layouts. This layout was then optimized with the help of experiments and simulations. For example, an improvement in resolution was achieved through a reduction of the susceptibility of the metal.
Finally, the coil was embedded into a microfluidic chip. This chip allows an easy sample supply into the coil interior and protects the coil from damage. As a side effect, the chip has a positive influence on the resolution of the detector.
The best RUMs have a volume of only 1.5 nl, show a linewidth of only 8 ppb and a normalized limit of detection of 0.6 nmol√Hz at 600 MHz. The achieved resolution and sensitivity allow to resolve a 1H ethanol spectrum fully in a single measurement of 6 s duration. Compared to a standard shimmed NMR detector, where the linewidth is 0.65 ppb and the nLOD 10 nmol√Hz, the RUMs linewidth still needs some improvement, but the limit of detection is already an order of magnitude smaller. Combined with the fact that the limit of detection improves with linewidth, this shows the far superior sensitivity of RUMs compared to standard setups. A comparison with literature is also very promising, where optimized RUMs compete with the best published microcoils. Additionally, RUMs can be produced en masse, with, at the moment, four coils fitting on a single 50 x 50 mm2 glass substrate, while the best other microcoils were all made for single, specific experiments one at a time. And finally, the here presented recipe for self-assembled, RUMs is easily adaptable to even smaller sample volumes and to other coil layouts. It can be used to produce matching gradient coil systems and is a guideline on how to combine NMR and other techniques while maintaining a high NMR performance.:Introduction
Nuclear magnetic resonance
1 NMR principle
1.1 A single nucleus in a magnetic field
1.2 Multiple spins in external field
1.3 Spins in natura
1.4 Typical liquid state spectrum
1.5 Typical NMR setup
2 Properties of an NMR detector
2.1 Quality of rf-field
2.2 Resolution
2.3 Signal-to-noise ratio
2.4 How to optimize a microcoil
3 Existing microdetectors
3.1 Solenoids
3.2 Saddle coils
3.3 Flat coils
3.4 Striplines/Microslots
4 Comparing microdetectors
4.1 The limit of detection
4.2 Performance of published microcoils
Self-assembly
5 What is self-assembly?
6 Self-assembly in microfabrication
6.1 Macroscopic self-assembly
6.2 Self-rolled tubes
7 Self-assembly of rolled-up microcoils
7.1 Working principle
7.2 Experimental methods for self-assembly
8 Encapsulating rolled-up tubes
8.1 Microfluidics
8.2 Microfluidic chip
8.3 Experimental methods for encapsulation
Rolled-up microcoils
9 Fabrication
9.1 Bilayer
9.2 Coil geometry
9.3 Metal stack
9.4 Supporting elements
9.5 Rolling process
9.6 Final layout
9.7 Microfluidic integration
10 Reducing susceptibility-induced field distortions
10.1 Simulating field distortions
10.2 Influence of the coil shape
10.3 Susceptibility matching
11 NMR performance
11.1 Measurement setup
11.2 Quality of rf-field
11.3 Resolution and sensitivity
11.4 Comparison to published microcoils
12 Outlook
12.1 Further improvements to rf-field, FWHM and nLOD
12.2 New coil shapes
12.3 New applications
Summary
Appendix
A Simulation and maths
A.1 Filling factor and rf-homogeneity
A.2 Nutation and rf-homogeneity
A.3 FT of one-sided exponential
A.4 DFT
A.5 Programs
B Protocols
B.1 Polymeric platform
B.2 Metal layers
C Test protocols
C.1 Wet etching
D Calculations for nLODs
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:76472 |
| Date | 08 November 2021 |
| Creators | Lepucki, Piotr |
| Contributors | Büchner, Bernd, Schmidt, Oliver G., Technische Universität Dresden, Leibniz-Insitut für Festkörper- und Werkstoffforschung Dresden e.V. |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Leibniz Gemeinschaft/Leibniz-Transfer/T62/2019//Micro-scale resonators for nuclear and electron spin resonance spectroscopies |
Page generated in 0.0034 seconds