As digitalization continues to advance, digital tools have become omnipresent in the classroom, and Student Response Systems (SRSs) have emerged as a valuable tool for teachers. However, the added value and efficacy of integrating gamified SRSs, compared to non-gamified SRSs, in the classroom has yet to be fully explored. Furthermore, little attention has been paid to non-gamified SRSs. The present study examines how a gamified learning environment in SRSs impacts vocabulary acquisition compared to a non-gamified learning environment. To analyze this effect, a quantitative study was designed using statistical analyses such as the Shapiro-Wilk test, the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. SRSs, namely Gimkit and Socrative, were selected to measure vocabulary acquisition. A total of 61 high school students studying English were enrolled in this study. Eighteen target words have been picked from two different vocabulary books designed to help students reach the C1 level in English. The selected words have all been identified as adjectives. The students were split into two class-based groups, and each was assigned a SRS to use for two 20-minute study sessions, happening at an interval of three days. To measure the effect of the two SRSs on vocabulary acquisition, three tests were conducted over three weeks. The students took a pre-test, an immediate post-test after the second study session, and a final delayed post-test two weeks later. The statistical analysis and the results of the three tests measuring vocabulary acquisition revealed a statistically significant improvement in vocabulary test scores for both groups in the short- and long-term. However, no statistical significance was shown for the test scores between the two groups: gamified and non-gamified learning environments. Hence, a gamified learning environment using SRSs was shown to have no statistical significance on vocabulary learning and retention compared to a non-gamified one. While digital tools are widely embraced, this study suggests that gamified SRSs, compared to non-gamified SRSs, may not offer a significant advantage in terms of vocabulary acquisition and retention. It is, therefore, important for the teachers to get to know their students and find the type of SRSs that suit their learning style best. Further studies could investigate the impact of gamified and non-gamified SRS on the students’ vocabulary acquisition and motivation over a school year to understand the effects better.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:su-227648 |
| Date | January 2024 |
| Creators | Xerri, Cindy |
| Publisher | Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds