Return to search

The dialogics of satire : foci and faultlines in George Orwell's Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four

Dissertation (PhD)--Stellenbosch University, 2000. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis uses Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of dialogism, as well as
postmodernism, to open up faultlines in satire, and to explore and challenge
various perceptions and discourses surrounding and related to it. Both
dialogism and postmodernism are used to suggest fresh approaches to satire,
by repositioning it in relation to other discourses and reframing it as a
complex dynamic, rather than a closed and inflexible system. Chapter 1 of the
thesis opens with an historical survey of the beginnings and subsequent
development of satire. It also contains a general discussion of the nature of
satiric strategies and opens the door for the incorporation of postmodern
perspectives into the argument. Chapter 2 contrasts the issues of morality
and re-presentation in satire, arguing that satirists do not simply invite their
audience to condemn, but offer them an opportunity to discover alternative
worlds. The affinity between satire and postmodernism is emphasised by the
postmodern predilection for modes highly favoured by satire: allegory, parody
and fantasy. In Chapter 3 the issue of language and its referents is explored,
starting with Saussure's theory of how the signifier and the signified function.
It is argued that satire has never respected this fixed relationship, and that it
is in this respect similar to deconstruction. The last part of the chapter is
devoted to examining four key socio-political discourses - psychoanalysis,
ideology, propaganda and political myth - in relation to satire. These four
discourses are, like satire, intent on influencing the perceptions which people
have of the world. The intention in juxtaposing these discourses is to create a
dialogic process which will throw a fresh light on all of them, including satire
itself. The four socio-political discourses named above play an important part
in Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four, and are relevant to the subsequent
discussion of these novels. Chapter 4 consists of a detailed discussion of
Animal Farm, in which the various layers comprising the work are examined.
The satirical aspects of the novel are closely related to the fabular and fairy
tale elements which are an important part of its constitution. These elements or levels are juxtaposed with the historical details alluded to continuously in
Animal Farm and indicate its close concern with the world outside the novel.
Chapter 5 consists of a detailed exploration of Nineteen Eighty-Four, which is
illuminated by a process of dialogism between the modernist ideology from
which the novel springs and the postmodern perspective introduced into the
thesis, as well as the four socio-political discourses mentioned earlier. The
main postmodern theories used in this chapter are those of Foucault. The last
section of the thesis demonstrates how Orwell's personal experience drives
his satire, and relates this specifically to a discussion of utopia / dystopia in
satire. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die Dialogiek van Satire: Fokuspunte en Breuke in Orwell se Animal
Farm en Nineteen Eighty-Four: Hierdie proefskrif maak gebruik van Mikhail Bakhtin se teorie van dialogisme,
sowel as die postmodernisme, om die breuke in satire bloot te le, en om die
verskillende persepsies en diskoerse wat verband hou met die satire te
ondersoek en te bevraagteken. Beide die dialogisme en die postmodernisme
word gebruik om nuwe perspektiewe op satire te open, deur dit te
herposisioneer in verhouding tot ander diskoerse en dit voor te stel in terme
van 'n komplekse dinamika eerder as 'n geslote en onbuigsame sisteem. Die
eerste hoofstuk van die proefskrif begin met 'n historiese oorsig van die
oorspronge en daaropvolgende ontwikkeling van satire. Dit omvat ook 'n
algemene bespreking van die aard van satiriese strateqiee en open die
moontlikheid om postmodernistiese perspektiewe in die argument te
integreer. Hoofstuk 2 kontrasteer die kwessies van moraliteit en representasie
in satire met mekaar; daar word geargumenteer dat satirici nie net hulle
gehore uitnooi om te veroordeel nie, maar hulle die geleentheid gee om
alternatiewe werelde te ontdek. Die verwantskap tussen satire en
postmodernisme word benadruk deur die postmodernisme se voorliefde vir
die modi waaraan die satire so dikwels voorkeur gee: allegorie, parodie en
fantasie. In hoofstuk 3 word die kwessie van taal en referensialiteit ondersoek, beginnende by Saussure se teorie oor die funksionering van die
betekenaar en die betekende. Daar word geargumenteer dat satire nog nooit
die vaste verhouding tussen betekenaar en betekende eerbiedig het nie, en
dat dit in hierdie opsig verwant is aan die dekonstruksie. Die laaste gedeelte
van die hoofstuk word gewy aan 'n ondersoek van vier sentrale sosio-politiese
diskoerse - psigoanalise, ideologie, propaganda en politieke mitologie - in
verhouding met satire. Hierdie vier diskoerse is, soos satire, daarop ingestel
om mense se persepsies/opvattings van die. wereld te verander. Die
doelstelling met die jukstaposisie van hierdie diskoerse is die skep van 'n
dialogiese proses wat al vier hierdie diskoerse, insluitende satire, in 'n nuwe
lig sal stel. Die genoemde sosio-politiese diskoerse speel 'n belangrike rol in
Animal Farm en Nineteen Eighty-Four, en is relevant vir die daaropvolgende
bespreking van die romans. Hoofstuk 4 bestaan uit 'n gedetailleerde
bespreking van Animal Farm, waarin daar ondersoek ingestel word na die
verskillende lae waaruit die roman bestaan. Die satiriese aspekte van die
roman word in noue verband gebring met die fabulere en die feeverhaalelemente
wat so 'n belangrike deel uitmaak van die roman se samestelling.
Hierdie elemente of vlakke word gejukstaponeer met die historiese detail
waarna daar deurlopend in Animal Farm verwys word en wat die noue
bemoeienis met die wereld buite die roman aandui. Hoofstuk 5 bestaan uit 'n
intensiewe ondersoek van Nineteen Eighty-Four, wat belig word deur 'n
proses van dialogisme tussen die modernistiese ideologie waaruit die roman
spruit en die postmodernistiese perspektiewe wat in die proefskrif ingevoer
word. Die belangrikste postmodernistiese teoriee wat in hierdie hoofstuk
gebruik word, is die van Foucault. Die laaste afdeling van die proefskrif
demonstreer hoedat Orwell se persoonlike ervaring bepalend is vir sy satire
en bring dit spesifiek in verband met 'n bespreking van utopie/distopie in
satire.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:sun/oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/51961
Date12 1900
CreatorsGoodman, Ralph
ContributorsHeyns, M. W., Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences. Dept. of English.
PublisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
Languageen_ZA
Detected LanguageUnknown
TypeThesis
Format327 p.
RightsStellenbosch University

Page generated in 0.0033 seconds