本文有鑑於我國教師於2011年5月納入勞動三法的規範適用，卻在團體協商的法制度與落實面上仍遭遇諸多困境，故本文從日本發展純熟的公立中小學教師勞動關係中汲取經驗。
我國公立中小學校教師雖已適用勞動三法，然而在薪資來源與勞動權限制上，實與日本公立中小學校教師的勞動條件規範具有相似性，因此，本文選擇日本公立中小學教師之團體協商制度為研究範圍，運用文獻分析法與訪談法，先了解日本法制對於教職員組合的團體協商的規範與限制，再來檢視我國教師工會團體協商的現況。
研究發現我國教師未先享有勞動法制的自由放任期，故在勞動意識的覺醒上，落後於日本教師，而我國教師對勞工身分的躊躇，也影響工會運作，使得勞動教育的宣導成為我國教師工會現階段的核心任務。
日本與我國在教師組織協商法制上，皆有過多限制，亦有不足之處，本文認為日本政府先干預了制度的建立，又消極地在不健全的制度中仰賴勞資自治，而我國的勞資關係，有賴國家的介入得以維護勞動者的權益，但「核可制」也干預了勞資自治的空間。兩國在國家干預與勞資自治之間尚未找到動態的平衡，皆有很大的努力空間。而日本法制上對於雇主當事人的明確定義，以及對於勞動權受限而設置的補償措施，值得我國借鏡。 / Although the labor rights of teachers in Taiwan have been protected by the Three Basic Labor Laws since May 2011, the collective bargaining still faces difficulties on implementation and law itself. The key discussion in this dissertation is to analyze the experience from well-developed skilled labor relationship in the Japanese public elementary and high school teacher organizations in order to realize the situations in Taiwan.
The Three Basic Labor Laws don’t truly reflect the salary structures and the labor right restrictions of public elementary and high school teachers. Instead, both designs are more similar to Japanese labor rights and related laws. Thus, I adopt document analysis and interviews to study the laws of collective bargaining in Japanese teacher organizations and explore the implementation of collective bargaining in public elementary and high school teacher organizations in Taiwan.
The study shows that teachers in Taiwan are not entitled to the legal system of laissez-faire and then it causes the progression of labor consciousness of teachers are much behind in Taiwan than Japan. Besides, hesitation to labor identity awareness impedes the operations in the teachers’ union as well. So, advocating labor education becomes the main task to the teachers’ union at this moment.
There are many restrictions in teacher's organizations both in Taiwan and Japan. The Japanese government intervene the establishment of collective bargaining, however, on the other hand, they passively rely on labor autonomy with this unhealthy system. In Taiwan, we depend on government to safeguard the rights and interests of workers. However, excessive intervention (such as Approves system in Collective Agreement Act) also restricts labor autonomy. Although both countries still need much effort to get the balance between government intervention and labor autonomy, it’s worthy to learn from Japan regarding to the clear definition to employers in labor law systems and the compensation to labor right restrictions.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0101861009 |
| Creators | 陳惠玟, Chen, Hui Wen |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds