Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-09-25T18:29:19Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - Mariana Telles Rocha.pdf: 1081497 bytes, checksum: ca49dd03a2afea90b84ff4c91dbf2f76 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-25T18:29:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - Mariana Telles Rocha.pdf: 1081497 bytes, checksum: ca49dd03a2afea90b84ff4c91dbf2f76 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-05-29 / The paradigm of modern science has been questioned since its inception, and more broadly and profoundly in this century. There are some proposals to rethink it as a whole, relying on several theoretical-practical essays on how to emerge a different paradigm. For that, we will have different ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies, we will enunciate them from multiple places. This allows the existence of multi-faceted looks, reframing the notions of neutrality, rationalism, dualism, reductionism, one-sidedness as the only way to build a truly scientific knowledge. One of these places of enunciation is agroecology, currently recognized as science, social movement, practice, way of life, utopia, government policy, profession, formal education modality, ideology. In order to discuss these different definitions and practices in agroecology, in an attempt to interact and multiply efforts, a perspective that is being used and strengthened by collectives and individuals is the networking and construction of gift networks. To leave the modern paradigm of science and arrive at another under construction, it is necessary to consider the process of transition. Understanding the political character of scientific activity, taking into account the indissociability between teaching, research and extension, agroecology uses a series of methodologies to build agroecological knowledge, seeking to foster dialogue between different knowledge that are equally incomplete. One of the methodologies used is the agroecological and cultural caravans, which has a series of horizontal communication tools such as artistic pedagogical installations, graphic facilitation, and collaborative communication. The sources used for its conception were, among others, the experiences of peasant-to-peasant methodologies, caravans of citizenship, and pilgrimages of the land. We notice the need to consider the psychological structures in the understanding of the interaction and the relationship of this with the structure of society and with the structure of history. Through the moments and spaces built by the ?Comboio Agroecol?gico Sudeste? network, it was possible to see the relationships between the individual, the methodology, the epistemology in the construction of the paradigm of agroecology, and how the agroecological and cultural caravan contributes to the emergence of a new form of building knowledge. In order to deepen and to highlight the clues of this paradigm transition, it is necessary to understand i) whether and how we are moving from cartesian science to a systemic, complex, agroecological, post-normal, postmodern, and / or decolonial science; ii) whether and how we are moving from a state of automatic unconsciousness, which reproduces patterns, which does not assume commitments, to a state of individuation, a "Greater Being" committed to itself and to the collectives iii) how and if the network, through the Caravan of Rio de Janeiro, promoted the dialogue of knowledge in the construction of agroecological knowledge; is therefore to verify if and how we are polishing the lenses of seeing, feeling, thinking, intuiting and being in the world. Some categories emerged from the content analysis and collected interviews conducted to answer these questions. From the construction, realization and evaluation of the agroecological and cultural caravan of Rio de Janeiro, it was possible to verify the paradoxical and complex nature of reality, and the different understandings about what is supposedly a same event, process and a same methodology. / O paradigma da ci?ncia moderna vem sendo questionado desde seus prim?rdios, e mais ampla e profundamente neste s?culo. Existem algumas propostas para repens?-lo como um todo, contando com v?rios ensaios te?rico-pr?ticos de como emergir um paradigma diferente. Para tanto, contaremos com diferentes ontologias, epistemologias e metodologias, as enunciaremos de m?ltiplos lugares. Isso permite ? exist?ncia de olhares pluriversais, ressignificando as no??es de neutralidade, racionalismo, dualismo, reducionismo, unilateralidade como ?nico caminho de construir um conhecimento verdadeiramente cient?fico. Um desses lugares de enuncia??o ? a agroecologia, reconhecida atualmente como ci?ncia, movimento social, pr?tica, modo de vida, utopia, pol?tica governamental, profiss?o, modalidade de educa??o formal, ideologia. Para dialogar essas diferentes defini??es e pr?ticas na agroecologia, na tentativa de interagir e multiplicar esfor?os, uma perspectiva que vem sendo utilizada e fortalecida pelos coletivos e indiv?duos ? a atua??o em rede e constru??o das redes de d?divas. Para sair do paradigma moderno de ci?ncia e chegar a outro em constru??o, ? necess?rio considerarmos um processo de transi??o. Entendendo o car?ter pol?tico existente na atividade cient?fica, levando em considera??o a indissociabilidade entre ensino, pesquisa e extens?o, a agroecologia lan?a m?o de uma s?rie de metodologias para construir o conhecimento agroecol?gico, buscando fomentar o di?logo entre os diferentes saberes que s?o igualmente incompletos. Uma das metodologias utilizadas s?o as caravanas agroecol?gicas e culturais, que conta com uma s?rie de ferramentas de comunica??o horizontal como as instala??es art?sticas pedag?gicas, facilita??o gr?fica, comunica??o colaborativa. As fontes utilizadas para sua concep??o foram, entre outras, as experi?ncias das metodologias campesino-a-campesino, caravanas da cidadania, e romarias da terra. Notamos a necessidade de considerar as estruturas psicol?gicas no entendimento da intera??o e da rela??o desta com a estrutura da sociedade e com a estrutura hist?ria. Atrav?s dos momentos e espa?os constru?dos pela rede do projeto Comboio Agroecol?gico Sudeste, foi poss?vel enxergarmos as rela??es entre o indiv?duo, a metodologia, a epistemologia na constru??o do paradigma da agroecologia, e como a caravana agroecol?gica e cultural contribui para a emerg?ncia de uma nova forma de construir o conhecimento. Para aprofundar e evidenciar as pistas dessa transi??o de paradigmas, ? necess?rio entender i) se e como estamos transitando da ci?ncia cartesiana para uma ci?ncia sist?mica, complexa, agroecol?gica, p?s-normal, p?s-moderna, e/ou descolonial; ii) se e como estamos transitando de um estado de inconsci?ncia autom?tica, que reproduz padr?es, que n?o assume compromissos, para um estado de individua??o, um ?Ser Maior? compromissado com si mesmo e com os coletivos; iii) como e se a rede, atrav?s da Caravana do Rio de Janeiro, promoveu o di?logo de saberes na constru??o do conhecimento agroecol?gico; ?, portanto, verificar se e como estamos polindo as lentes de ver, sentir, pensar, intuir, ser e estar no mundo. Algumas categorias emergiram da an?lise de conte?do e entrevistas coletadas, realizadas para responder essas quest?es. A partir da constru??o, realiza??o e avalia??o da caravana agroecol?gica e cultural do Rio de Janeiro, foi poss?vel verificarmos a natureza paradoxal e complexa da realidade, e os diversos entendimentos acerca do que ? supostamente um mesmo acontecimento, processo e uma mesma metodologia.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/2471 |
| Date | 29 May 2017 |
| Creators | ROCHA, Mariana Telles |
| Contributors | Uz?da, Mariella Camardelli, Uz?da, Mariella Camardelli, Schmitt, Claudia Job, Cardoso, Irene Maria |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Agricultura Org?nica, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Agronomia |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds