Return to search

Constructing Performance Evaluation Criteria with AHP for Production Supervisors - A Case Study on Taiwan Paper Industry

Paper industry in Taiwan is mainly focused on domestic demand. Its production and sales not only are related to economic growth but also serve as an index of a nation¡¦s economic situation. Due to the business model of this industry, production line workers compose the majority of employees of the enterprise. So production supervisors play a very important role in the effectiveness of first-line worker management and improvement of operation procedures. Therefore, production supervisors in Taiwan paper industry are focused as the subject of this research. The purpose of this study is to propose, by applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an approach to construct Performance Evaluation Indicators and weights. Specific suggestions for the construction and modification of Performance Appraisal system for paper industry in Taiwan will also be made.
The research method includes literature review and references made to industrial practice, by which performance appraisal criteria for production supervisors were drafted. Further, expert survey on the evaluation system in use was carried out among members of Taiwan Paper Industry Association. Based on the data gathered from the questionnaire survey, analysis of importance and the AHP approach were applied to construct the structure and weights of the Performance Appraisal Criteria for production supervisors. Also, validation was made in a manufacture of the paper industry. Empirical examination supports the practicality and fitness of the structure of this Performance Evaluation System. Finally, analysis results were concluded into suggestions for administrative practice and future studies. Findings of this research are as follows:
I. Performance Appraisal Criteria and weights
The Performance Appraisal Criteria includes the following three constructs: 1. Work achievement (Weight : 0.4092) ; 2. Professional capacity (Weight : 0.3383); 3. Work behavior and attitude (Weight : 0.2525).
II. Secondary Performance Appraisal Criteria and weights
1. ¡§Work achievement¡¨ construct includes the following 6 items: (1) Occupational safety (Weight: 0.1598); (2) Product quality (Weight: 0.0739); (3) Cost control (Weight: 0.0536); (4) Discipline (Weight: 0.0409); (5) Production capacity (Weight: 0.0408); (6) Equipment utilization efficiency (Weight: 0.0400).
¡@2. ¡§Professional capacity¡¨ construct includes 6 items: (1) Executive skills (Weight : 0.0549); (2) Leadership (Weight : 0.0512); (3) Resourcefulness (Weight : 0.0423); (4) Professional knowledge and skills (Weight : 0.0404); (5) Interpersonal relationship skills (Weight : 0.0323); (6) Strategy-making (Weight : 0.0314).
¡@3. ¡§Work behavior and attitude¡¨ construct has 7 sub-items: (1) Teamwork and cooperation (Weight 0.0676); (2) Integrity (Weight 0.0577); (3) Responsibility (Weight 0.0545); (4) Proactivity (Weight 0.0439); (5) Cost-consciousness (Weight 0.0434); (6) Professional attitude (Weight 0.0403); (7) Self-control (Weight 0.0309).

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0617105-092936
Date17 June 2005
CreatorsWang, Hsin-Ju
ContributorsYi-Jung Chen, Chin-Ming Ho, Shyh-Jer Chen
PublisherNSYSU
Source SetsNSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive
LanguageCholon
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0617105-092936
Rightscampus_withheld, Copyright information available at source archive

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds