Section 25 of the Swedish Protection of Employment Act states that an employed person who gets his job cancelled because of shortage of work has a right to get re-employment within a certain period of time. The purpose of this regulation is to give employees a protection of employment. But it is frequently criticized by employers, claiming that the regulation restricts their right to lead and distribute the work in a way that is most profitable for the business. This means that the regulation must be applied in a way that accommodates the employees’ needs for a secure employment as well as the employers’ needs of efficiency and flexibility within the business. There are different approaches used by the employers to avoid the application of section 25. Some of the approaches are acceptable by The Swedish Labor Court and some are not. The main question is therefore if the approaches that are accepted by The Swedish Labor Court in some way collide with section 25 of the Swedish Protection of Employment Act. If so, how can the judicial system be altered to better correspond with the Swedish legislation?
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:hj-15983 |
| Date | January 2011 |
| Creators | Aho, Christine |
| Publisher | Högskolan i Jönköping, Internationella Handelshögskolan |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0013 seconds