Return to search

智價經濟時代的智慧財產權管理-科技業產學研合作之研究 / The Intellectual Property Right Management in the Collaborated Research between Industry, University, and Research Institute.

台灣的產業型態已逐漸由勞力密集的傳統產業轉型為知識密集的科技產業,已成為資訊電子生產大國,共有十多項資訊設備佔有率高居世界第一。而我國以中小企業為主的產業結構,研發經費的投入往往無法與國外大廠相比,產學研合作研發便成為我國產業創新中相當重要的一個環節,大學與研發機構在研發創新上的成果是提升產業技術水準的重要來源。
智慧財產權在科技業可說是重要的競爭武器之一,智慧財產權管理更為各企業亟欲增進的能力。立法院於1998年底通過科學技術基本法,通過將合作研發成果的智財權中政府出資部分的權利下放給研發單位,對我國產學研合作的智慧財產權管理具有相當之影響,而後如何執行以達成技術擴散,更是需要深入探討。
本文希望從管理面與法律面來探討產學研合作的智慧財產權管理,透過(1)國內外文獻探討;(2)專家深度訪談;(3)先進國家產學研合作與智財權管理之探討;(4)國內產學研合作與智財權管理之個案分析等方式來進行探討。借重國外經驗,發現國內實行時的問題,以期經由良好的合作與技術移轉制度,使學研單位獲得經費補助與權利金回饋,且亦使廠商獲得切合需要之技術的使用權,讓創新成果獲得保護,並讓知識能充分移轉流通,強化我國國家創新系統。
本研究建議如下:
一、 對政府而言
(一) 以藏富於民的原則將智財權下放
(二) 例外介入以使成果充分使用
(三) 專利成果應用的限制
(四) 建立產業技術移轉服務體系(ITTS)
(五) 修改相關法令
二、 對大學而言
(一) 應設立專責的智慧財產權管理單位
(二) 與中介機構合作執行智慧財產權管理
(三) 將研究方向分為基礎研究導向與產業技術導向
(四) 鼓勵大學教授投入產業服務
(五) 設立創新技術公司
三、 對研發機構而言
(一) 研發機構應更積極鼓勵研發人員投入研發
(二) 積極與民間企業合作並從事技術推廣與技術移轉
(三) 加強智慧財產權管理能力
(四) 落實R&D人數/智財權業務人數比例
四、 對廠商而言
(一) 培養本身研發能力與技術承接能力
(二) 善用外在技術資源
(三) 建立智慧財產權權管理制度
(四) 與學研單位合作應秉持多次合作的誠意
(五) 與學研單位建立長期合作關係並合理的給予回饋

目錄
表 目 錄 3
圖 目 錄 5
第一章 緒論 7
第一節 研究背景 7
第二節 研究動機 10
第三節 研究目的與問題 12
第四節 研究大綱 13
第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 智慧財產權 15
第二節 科技基本法 26
第三節 產學合作 29
第四節 產研合作 39
第三章 研究方法 45
第一節 研究取向 45
第二節 研究方法 47
第三節 訪談對象 48
第四節 個案範圍 49
第五節 研究限制 50
第四章 先進國家產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 51
第一節 美國產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 51
第二節 日本產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 83
第三節 德國產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 101
第五章 國內個案分析 119
第一節 工業技術研究院 119
第二節 台大慶齡工業中心 155
第三節 宏□電腦 175
第六章 結論與建議 191
第一節 結論 191
第二節 對政府的建議 195
第三節 對大學的建議 201
第四節 對研發機構的建議 204
第五節 對產業界的建議 206
第六節 對後續研究的建議 209
參考文獻 213 / Taiwan’s industry has transferred from traditional labor-intensive industries to knowledge-intensive technology industries. Furthermore, Taiwan has become a leading country for information and electronics manufacturing industries. According to statistical data, Taiwan has leaded more than ten items of components in their industries in the world and their marketing shares are getting up.
But our industrial structure is based on Small Middle Enterprise (SME). The R&D capability can’t keep up with the oversea big companies. The collaboration between industry, university, and research institute is very important for Taiwan’s industries. SME depend universities and research institutes’ research outcomes to bring up the industrial technology level.
Intellectual Property Right (IPR) is one of the most important competitive weapons for industry. As a result, IPR management ability is what every firm would like to cultivate. In 1998, the Legislative Yuan passed the Science and Technology Basic Law which allowing the IPR releasing from the government sponsored projects to the research institutes and universities. It would have a tremendous effect on the IPR management in collaborated research between industry, university, and research institute.
From the management and law’s point view, the purpose of this thesis is to (1) clarify and analyze the international and domestic data of IPR management; (2) compare the collaborated research between industry, university, and research institute in advanced countries such as the United State, Japan, and Germany; and (3) study the case of Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Taiwan University, and ACER to discover the practical IPR management problems in Taiwan.
With proper university and industry collaboration and technology transfer system, universities will get proper return for the research fund and industry will be able to utilize the invention well. Therefore the innovative research outcomes would be protected and the knowledge would diffuse smoothly that reinforce Taiwan’s National Innovation System (NIS).
Consequently, this thesis makes the following suggestions for government, universities, research institutes, and industries:
1. For Government
(1) Allow the university and research institute to own the Intellectual Property Right.
(2) Government own the exceptional involvement right in order to apply the R&D outcomes well.
(3) Proper restriction to patent application.
(4) Establish Industrial Technology Transfer Service (ITTS).
(5) Amend the relative regulations and laws.
2. For University
(1) Establish specific IPR management office.
(2) Collaborate with the agency institute to executive IPR management.
(3) Divide research direction into basic research orientation and industrial technology research orientation.
(4) Encourage professors devoting the industrial service.
(5) Fund the innovation technological company.
3. For Research Institute
(1) Encourage R&D staff devoting more effort in their job.
(2) Actively collaborate with industry and engage in technology transfer and promotion.
(3) Enhance IPR management ability.
(4) Improve the R&D staff / IPR management staff ratio.
4. For Industry
(1) Cultivate R&D ability and technology receiving ability.
(2) Utilize outside technology resource well.
(3) Establish IPR management system.
(4) Remain condor when collaborate with universities and research institutes.
(5) Establish long-term partnership with universities and research institutes then give them reasonable feedback.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/B2002001457
Creators陳立昕, LI-HSIN, CHEN
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.003 seconds