Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-11-12T10:36:36Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
476058 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 3545286 bytes, checksum: 5726f88b09c3b9a1c17e30a28e2f1611 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-11-12T10:36:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
476058 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 3545286 bytes, checksum: 5726f88b09c3b9a1c17e30a28e2f1611 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-08-31 / This study focused the examination of acceleration techniques of legal protection through the cuts in cognitive activity, both in extent and in depth. For this, the small claims court was used, reintroduced in Brazilian law in 1995 by Law n. 9079/95 and maintained in the new Civil Procedure Code in Articles 700-?702 with some notes to the new institute of stabilization of interim protection provided for in articles 303 and 304 of the CPC/2015, which previous decision also lends itself to analysis in the context of this work. Before that, there was a brief foray with summarized references, into the study of the history of civil procedure as an autonomous and detached science of substantive law, progressing to the understanding of constitutional procedural law as now conceived. The migration of the procedural science, seen as civilized and democratic driving technique of social conflicts, in interpreting permeated with constitutional rules and principles, demanded an investigation into the most recurring doctrines, especially the study Ronald Dworkin and Robert Alexy, whose works both influenced and still influences the understanding of the rules and principles and their roles in the various legal systems. The central idea of the work was to examine the scientific basis for allowing the legislator and the law enforcer, without violation of constitutional rules and principles which ensure the wide defense and the contradictory, working with ways in which the defense is deferred or postponed or even with reduced cognition field, all understood as legitimate ways to better mold the instrument to the content of the claimed right equipment. / O presente estudo tem como foco o exame das t?cnicas de acelera??o da tutela jurisdicional atrav?s dos cortes na atividade cognitiva, tanto na extens?o quanto na profundidade. Para isso, trabalhou-?se com a a??o monit?ria, reintroduzida no direito brasileiro em 1995, pela Lei n? 9.079/95 e mantida no novo C?digo de Processo Civil/2015, nos artigos 700 a 702 com algumas notas ao novo instituto da estabiliza??o da tutela provis?ria prevista nos artigos 303 e 304 do mesmo diploma legal, cuja sumariedade tamb?m se presta para an?lise no contexto deste trabalho. Antes disso, fez-?se uma breve incurs?o, com sint?ticas e abreviad?ssimas refer?ncias, ao estudo do hist?rico do processo civil como ci?ncia aut?noma e desapegada do direito material, evoluindo-?se ao entendimento do direito processual constitucional tal como hoje concebido. A migra??o da ci?ncia processual, vista como t?cnica de condu??o civilizada e democr?tica dos conflitos sociais, para a interpreta??o permeada de regras e princ?pios constitucionais, exigiu uma investiga??o acerca das mais recorrentes doutrinas, com destaque aos estudos de Ronald Dworkin e Robert Alexy, cujas obras tanto influenciaram e ainda hoje influenciam a compreens?o das regras e princ?pios e seus pap?is nos diversos ordenamentos jur?dicos. A ideia central do trabalho ? examinar as bases cient?ficas que permitem ao legislador e ao aplicador da lei, sem viola??o ?s regras e princ?pios constitucionais que asseguram a ampla defesa e o contradit?rio, trabalhar com formas em que a defesa fica diferida ou postergada, ou ainda com campo de cogni??o reduzido, tudo bem compreendido como formas leg?timas de melhor afei?oar o instrumento ao conte?do do direito material reclamado.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6386 |
| Date | 31 August 2015 |
| Creators | Fischmann, Gerson |
| Contributors | Jobim, Marco F?lix |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds