Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-27T00:10:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
FelipeLuizMachadoBarros_DISSERT.pdf: 665459 bytes, checksum: a6e3b5a513348ffeab596d3f8136c049 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-09-01T20:39:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
FelipeLuizMachadoBarros_DISSERT.pdf: 665459 bytes, checksum: a6e3b5a513348ffeab596d3f8136c049 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-01T20:39:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FelipeLuizMachadoBarros_DISSERT.pdf: 665459 bytes, checksum: a6e3b5a513348ffeab596d3f8136c049 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-29 / Esta disserta??o tem o objetivo de investigar a rela??o entre o direito ao sil?ncio previsto no art. 5?, LXIII, da Constitui??o Federal brasileira e a previs?o de ren?ncia a esse direito trazida com o instituto da colabora??o premiada, mais precisamente no art. 4?, ? 14, da Lei 12.850/2013, verificando-se eventual inconstitucionalidade do dispositivo. A fim de alcan?ar o objetivo, ? feito exame do processo de constitucionaliza??o dos direitos fundamentais, a partir da 2? Guerra Mundial, com visita??o a algumas das teorias sustentadas. O fen?meno do crime organizado tamb?m passa pelo estudo, visto que o instrumento da colabora??o premiada foi criado justamente para dotar os ?rg?os de persecu??o criminal desse meio de obten??o de prova. O suporte metodol?gico-jur?dico do trabalho ser? na Teoria Liberal dos Direitos Fundamentais, de modo que ser? estudada a dogm?tica de tal teoria, por meio da qual ser? examinada a constitucionalidade da ren?ncia ao direito ao sil?ncio no ?mbito da colabora??o premiada, no contexto do crescente desenvolvimento de organiza??es criminosas, necessidade de aparelhamento do Estado de instrumentos de combate ao crime organizado, paralelo ao necess?rio respeito aos direitos fundamentais e limites ?s interven??es estatais na esfera individual. / This dissertation it aims to investigate the relationship between the right to silence provided
for in art. 5, LXIII, the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the prediction of waiver of that
right brought with the plea arrangement institute, more precisely on the article 4, ? 14 of Law
12,850/2013, verifying any state's evidence. In order to achieve the objective, it is taken from
the constitutional process of fundamental rights, from the 2nd World War, with visits to some
of supported theories. Organized crime phenomenon also goes by the study, as the plea
arrangement institute tool was created to provide the criminal prosecution bodies of the means
of obtaining evidence. The methodological and legal support work will be in the Liberal
Theory of Fundamental Rights, so that will be studied dogmatic of such a theory, by which
the constitutionality of the waiver of the right to silence under the plea arrangement institute,
will be examined in the context of growing development of criminal organizations, need to
equip the state to combat organized crime instruments, parallel to the necessary respect for
fundamental rights and limits on government intervention in the individual sphere.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21318 |
| Date | 29 March 2016 |
| Creators | Barros, Felipe Luiz Machado |
| Contributors | 16628876802, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6963079630876141, Coutinho, Francisco Ser?phico da N?brega, 45134286434, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9389940620613662, Ros?rio, Jos? Orlando Ribeiro, 09610294553, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7497832675271260, Martins, Leonardo |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM DIREITO, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0152 seconds