Return to search

O redesenho da educa??o profissional e tecnol?gica no Brasil nos dois governos de Lu?z In?cio Lula da Silva: de Centros Federais de Educa??o a Institutos Federais de Educa??o, Ci?ncia e Tecnologia: a experi?ncia do IFPB (2003 ? 2010)

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-12-12T19:12:13Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
FranciscoThadeuCarvalhoMatos_TESE.pdf: 2296689 bytes, checksum: 8ef9d6a1adebc3f600a041d8d03d3c90 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-12-14T17:10:47Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
FranciscoThadeuCarvalhoMatos_TESE.pdf: 2296689 bytes, checksum: 8ef9d6a1adebc3f600a041d8d03d3c90 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-14T17:10:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FranciscoThadeuCarvalhoMatos_TESE.pdf: 2296689 bytes, checksum: 8ef9d6a1adebc3f600a041d8d03d3c90 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-07-31 / A pesquisa que serviu de base para a constru??o desta tese de doutorado teve como objeto de investiga??o o processo de transforma??o do Centro Federal de Educa??o Tecnol?gica da Para?ba em Instituto Federal de Educa??o, Ci?ncia e Tecnologia ocorrido durante os dois governos do presidente Lu?s In?cio Lula da Silva (2003-2010). Buscou-se refletir sobre as raz?es desse processo em ?mbito nacional, para, em seguida, compreender como o mesmo se efetivou no referido estado. Por que, esta foi a quest?o central, as institui??es que comp?em a rede federal de educa??o profissional, embora j? tendo atingindo um n?vel bastante complexo, na sua forma jur?dica-institucional, tiveram de ser reconfiguradas para se constitu?rem em Institutos Federais que podem ofertar, desde a forma??o b?sica inicial, at? cursos de mestrado e doutorado? O que provocou esse fen?meno e quais as justificativas para faz?-lo? Na experi?ncia da Para?ba, dada a inexist?ncia de fontes secund?rias que reconstituam e analisem esse processo e a escassez de fontes prim?rias, salvo alguns documentos oficiais, o que h? s?o os relatos orais dos participantes. Por esta raz?o, foram realizadas entrevistas n?o estruturadas com oito indiv?duos, entre gestores e ex-gestores do antigo CEFET/PB, e utilizados tamb?m, como fonte de dados, a confer?ncia de um representante da SETEC/MEC, realizada na Para?ba no per?odo, e documentos oficiais. O m?todo de an?lise das entrevistas foi a an?lise tem?tica, de acordo com as orienta??es de autores como Bardin (1977), Richardson (2013), Bourdieu (2012) e Amado (2013). Dentre os apoios te?ricos sobre a educa??o profissional no Brasil, destacam-se: Cunha (1991; 2000), Manfredi (2002), Kuenzer (1990, 2015), Pacheco, Pereira, Domingos Sobrinho (2010), Pacheco (2011). Sobre representa??es sociais destacam-se os autores Moscovici (2012) e Jodelet (2001). Os resultados indicam que: o processo de transforma??o do CEFET/PB em IFPB reproduziu, em escala micro, a complexidade macro do processo de expans?o ocorrido em todo o pa?s; n?o obstante os limites e contradi??es entre discurso e pr?tica de um governo de car?ter popular e democr?tico, o mesmo mostrou ser poss?vel introduzir mudan?as na estrutura e formato da rede visando atender n?o s? as demandas da economia, mas tamb?m contribuir para o fortalecimento da cidadania; a an?lise da dimens?o psicossocial do fen?meno pesquisado, com base nas representa??es sociais (JODELET, 2001; MOSCOVICI, 2012) permitiu melhor compreender as a??es dos sujeitos engajados no processo evitando reduzi-las a epifen?menos das estruturas econ?micas, das disputas pol?tico-ideol?gicas ou a meras manifesta??es de idiossincrasias individuais. / The research that served as a basis for the construction of this doctoral thesis had as an object of investigation the process of transformation of the Federal Center of Technological Education of Para?ba into Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology that took place during the two governments of President Lu?s In?cio Lula da Silva (2003-2010). It was sought to reflect on the reasons for this process at the national level, and then to understand how it took place in the said state. Why, this was the central issue, the institutions that make up the federal network of professional education, although already having reached a very complex level, in their juridical-institutional form, had to be reconfigured to form Federal Institutes that can offer, from initial basic training, to master's and doctoral courses? What caused this phenomenon and what are the justifications for doing so? In the Para?ba experience, given the lack of secondary sources that reconstitute and analyze this process and the scarcity of primary sources, except for some official documents, what exists is the oral reports of the participants. For this reason, non-structured interviews were conducted with eight individuals, between managers and former managers of the former CEFET / PB, and also used, as a data source, the conference of a representative of SETEC / MEC, held in Para?ba, besides official documents. The method of analysis of the interviews was the thematic analysis, according to the guidelines of authors such as Bardin (1977), Richardson (2013), Bourdieu (2012) and Amado (2013). Among the theoretical supports on professional education in Brazil, the following stand out: Cunha (1991, 2000), Manfredi (2002), Kuenzer (1990, 2015), Pacheco, Pereira, Domingos Sobrinho (2010), Pacheco (2011). On social representations, the authors are Moscovici (2012) and Jodelet (2001). The results indicate that: the transformation process of CEFET / PB into IFPB reproduced, on a micro scale, the macro complexity of the expansion process that occurred throughout the country; despite the limits and contradictions between the discourse and the practice of a government of a popular and democratic nature, it has shown that it is possible to introduce changes in the structure and format of the network, in order to meet not only the demands of the economy but also to contribute to the strengthening of citizenship; the analysis of the psychosocial dimension of the researched phenomenon, based on social representations (JODELET, 2001; MOSCOVICI, 2012) allowed a better understanding of the actions of the subjects engaged in the process, avoiding to reduce them to epiphenomena of economic structures, political-ideological disputes or mere manifestations of individual idiosyncrasies.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24512
Date31 July 2017
CreatorsMatos, Francisco Thadeu Carvalho
Contributors10809520478, Ramalho, Betania Leite, 13604759404, Ara?jo, Edineide Jezine Mesquita, 27364445234, Alves, Gilcean Silva, 85481483491, Carvalho, Joabson Nogueira de, 40803120400, Paiva, Marlucia Menezes de, 07108842491, Barbosa J?nior, Walter Pinheiro, 56728069453, Domingos Sobrinho, Mois?s
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM EDUCA??O, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0027 seconds