Return to search

A biopol?tica em Giorgio Agamben: estado de exce??o, poder soberano, vida nua e campo

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T21:33:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DaniguiReniguiMartinsDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 915908 bytes, checksum: 4d2e4aa8ff487752ec8f6522aad615e8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-10T18:23:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DaniguiReniguiMartinsDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 915908 bytes, checksum: 4d2e4aa8ff487752ec8f6522aad615e8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-10T18:23:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DaniguiReniguiMartinsDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 915908 bytes, checksum: 4d2e4aa8ff487752ec8f6522aad615e8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-02-03 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O conceito de biopol?tica tem se tornado um rico instrumento de an?lise ou uma esclarecedora chave hermen?utica para a reflex?o contempor?nea sobre a l?gica do poder, a genealogia do governo e o significado da pol?tica no mundo moderno. As diferentes concep??es de biopol?tica t?m cada qual suas especificidades. O foco da abordagem do presente estudo ser? exclusivamente o diagn?stico biopol?tico do presente elaborado por Agamben, no qual o conceito de biopol?tica est? centrado na politiza??o da vida biol?gica. Procuramos mostrar o modo como a ?arqueologia da biopol?tica? empreendida por Agamben pode ser compreendida a partir da an?lise de quatro no??es fundamentais, quais sejam: poder soberano, vida nua, estado de exce??o e campo. Analisamos, primeiro, de que modo Agamben pensou a associa??o entre o dom?nio pol?tico e a animaliza??o do homem a partir das lacunas deixadas pelas investiga??es de Arendt e Foucault. Em um segundo momento, examinamos a rela??o entre a organiza??o soberana dos corpos e o estado de exce??o. No terceiro passo de nosso percurso, analisamos a politiza??o da vida nua e a produ??o do homo sacer, a sacralidade da vida. Em uma quarta e ?ltima etapa, esclarecemos de que modo Agamben pensou o ?campo? como ?n?mos? secreto da biopol?tica na modernidade. Trata-se de explicitar de que forma a reflex?o de Agamben sobre o nexo existente entre poder pol?tico e vida nua se articula em torno desses quatro aspectos estruturantes. Buscamos evidenciar a relevante contribui??o que o pensamento de Agamben oferece para o diagn?stico cr?tico da racionalidade pol?tica nas sociedades contempor?neas, aprimorando nossa compreens?o sobre as novas formas do poder na modernidade tardia. / The concept of biopolitics is a rich instrument of analysis and interpretation of the logic of power, the genealogy of government and the meaning of politics in the modern world. The different conceptions of biopolitics each have their specificities. The focus of the present study will be exclusively the biopolitical diagnosis of the present elaborated by Agamben, in which the concept of biopolitics is centered on the politicization of biological life. We seek to show how Agamben's ?archeology of biopolitics? can be understood from the analysis of four fundamental notions: sovereign power, bare life, state of exception, and field. We first analyze how Agamben thought the association between the political domain and the animalization of man from the gaps left by the investigations of Arendt and Foucault. In a second moment, we examine the relationship between the sovereign organization of bodies and the state of exception. In the third chapter, we analyze the politicization of natural life and the production of homo sacer, the sacred life. In the fourth chapter, we clarified how Agamben thought of the ?field? as a secret ?notion? of biopolitics in modernity. Therefore, we seek to show how Agamben's reflection on the nexus between political power and bare life is articulated around these four structuring aspects. We seek to highlight the relevant contribution that Agamben's thinking offers to the critical diagnosis of political rationality in contemporary societies, enhancing our understanding of the new forms of power in late modernity.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/22594
Date03 February 2017
CreatorsSouza, Danigui Renigui Martins de
Contributors07258002758, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7983480785136119, Savia, S?rgio Luis Rizzo Dela, 41806468115, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3569074915058707, Nascimento, Daniel Arruda, 05319181736, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0578569833689838, Alves Neto, Rodrigo Ribeiro
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM FILOSOFIA, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0029 seconds