Return to search

As cicatrizes do tempo: S. Bernardo e Dias e noites de amor e guerra / The scars of time: Saint Bernard and Days and nights of love and war

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-20T19:18:34Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
BethaniaLimaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 272085 bytes, checksum: 36579040f5cb32f88f7dbf0393da6566 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-21T20:04:47Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
BethaniaLimaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 272085 bytes, checksum: 36579040f5cb32f88f7dbf0393da6566 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-21T20:04:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
BethaniaLimaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 272085 bytes, checksum: 36579040f5cb32f88f7dbf0393da6566 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-07-25 / O trabalho As cicatrizes do tempo: S. Bernardo e Dias e noites de amor e de guerra
prop?e-se a analisar de forma comparativa os livros S?o Bernardo (1934), de Graciliano
Ramos (1892-1953) e Dias e noites de amor e de guerra (1978), de Eduardo Galeano
(1940-2015). Atrav?s dessas obras espec?ficas, mem?rias e hist?rias que refletem os
modos de perceber a viv?ncia de um mundo demonstram que a Am?rica Latina parece
estar passando por uma mesma experi?ncia liter?ria, ao longo do s?culo XX. O reflexo
da obra de Graciliano Ramos, em muitos aspectos, parece ser o mesmo que sobressai da
obra de Galeano nas hist?rias que conta atrav?s de seu jornalismo liter?rio e
memorialista. A hist?ria sofrida que aparece contada nos livros tamb?m est? na
mem?ria do povo. Esse encadear de mem?ria e realidade ? o que motiva a compara??o
entre os livros, uma vez que entre os dois autores ocorre uma rela??o que ultrapassa as
quest?es relativas ? distin??o de g?nero liter?rio: assim, vemos que, por um lado, a
realidade diversificada da Am?rica Latina que Eduardo Galeano apresenta em seu livro
parece ser o terreno amplo que produz a literatura de Graciliano, como se fosse sua raiz.
Por outro lado, na literatura de Graciliano, como produto est?tico efetivamente anterior
ao de Galeano, o pequeno mundo nordestino, fechado por sua rigorosa constru??o
ficcional, ressoa o sentido de uma semente, a partir da qual o autor uruguaio retratar? a
triste flora??o da realidade latino-americana. O respaldo te?rico vai ser referendado pela
literatura comparada, com T?nia Franco Carvalhal, pela est?tica social e hist?rica,
atrav?s das obras de Antonio Candido, pelos aspectos memorial?sticos ressaltados pelas
marcas do tempo em Ecl?a Bosi, e pelos acontecimentos sociohist?ricos apontados por
Seligmann-Silva. / The study ?The scars of time: Saint Bernard and Days and nights of love and war?,
proposes to comparatively analyze the books ?Sao Bernardo (Saint Bernard) (1934) by
Graciliano Ramos, (1892-1953) and Dias e noites de amor e de guerra (Days and nights
of war and peace)(1978),by Eduardo Galeano (1940-2015). These specific works,
memories and stories which reflect the ways of life and perception of the world, shows
that Latin America seems to be living the same literary experience during the twentieth
century. The reflection of Graciliano?s works, in many aspects, seems to be the same as
the one which excels in Galeano?s work in the stories which he tells through his literary
and memorialist journalism. The story that was lived and suffered and which appears in
books is also in people?s memories. This chain of memory and reality is the one which
motivates the comparison between the books, once that between the two authors there is
a relation which exceeds que questions related to the distinction in the literary genre.
We therefore see that, on one side, the diversified reality in Latin America that Eduardo
Galeano shows in his book seems to be the extensive grounds which produces
Gracilianos? literature as if it was his root. On the other side, in Gracialiano?s literature,
like an aesthetic product previous effectively to Galeano?s, the little northeastern world,
closed in by its strict fictional construction, resonates the sense of a seed through which
the Uruguayan author will portray the sad blossoming of the Latin American reality.
The theoretical support will be referenced by T?nia Franco Carvalhal?s comparative
literature, by the social and historic aesthetics through Antonio Candido?s works, by the
memorialist aspects which are highlighted by the traces of time in Ecl?a Bosi and by the
socio historic developments pointed out by Seligmann-Silva.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/22363
Date25 July 2016
CreatorsSilva, Beth?nia Lima
Contributors02879551846, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7240024746199267, Medeiros J?nior, Antonio Fernandes de, 20210256400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5180658924051594, Rodrigues, Manoel Freire, 62603698400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9924056309219258, Falleiros, Marcos Falchero
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0108 seconds