Agriculture causes large parts of global Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), with livestock contributing the greatest share. Livestock-based foods are thus associated to higher GHGE than plant-based foods. Additionally, they are harmful to health when consumed in excess. The focus of this work lies on determining the potential to reduce agricultural GHGE when healthy diets and lower meat intakes were adopted in the EU. lt is also examined how much feed crops and pastures would become available for the production of biofuels. An emission tax and an emission trading system are also examined. To assess the complex interactions in the agricultural sector, a modified version of the European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (EUFASOM) is used.
The results show that a halved meat intake could reduce agricultural GHGE by a quarter and biofuel production could increase eightfold. The political instruments lack effectiveness though. The GHG tax has a low impact on nutrition and roughly 50% emission leakage. Emission trading has only a moderate effect on nutrition and over 100% emission leakage.:1 Introduction
2 Goal and scope definition
3 Methodology
3.1 Overview
3.2 Spatial resolution
3.3 Products under consideration
3.4 Base data
3.4.1 Base quantities
3.4.2 Base prices
3.4.3 Base areas
3.4.4 Demand elasticities
3.5 Production processes
3.5.1 Crop production
3.5.2 Pasture production
3.5.3 Plant oil production
3.5.4 Biofuel production
3.5.5 Sugar production
3.5.6 Livestock production
3.6 EUFASOM – Theoretical foundation
3.7 EUFASOM – Demand and supply functions
3.8 EUFASOM – Model description
3.8.1 Objective function
3.8.2 Identity and convexity constraints
3.8.3 Product balance
3.8.4 Land use restrictions
3.8.5 Nitrogen balance
3.8.6 Further accounting equations
3.9 Calibration
3.10 Integration of scenarios
4 Scenarios and results
4.1 Scenario 1: Technical potential of healthy diets
4.1.1 What are healthy diets?
4.1.2 Implementation of healthy diets
4.1.3 Scenario 1.1: Healthy diets with constant calorie intake
4.1.4 Scenario 1.2: Healthy diets with restricted calorie intake
4.1.5 Scenario 1.3: Healthy diets with restricted ruminant meat intake
4.1.6 Discussion on the potentials of healthy diets
4.2 Scenario 2: Greenhouse gas emission taxes
4.3 Scenario 3: Redistribution of emissions taxes as biofuel subsidy
4.4 Scenario 4: Emissions trading scheme for agriculture
4.4.1 Scenario 4.1: GHGE-cap on agricultural production
4.4.2 Scenario 4.2: Combined GHGE-cap on agricultural production and net-imports
4.4.3 Scenario 4.3: GHGE-cap on agricultural production and generation of allowances through producing biofuels
4.4.4 Scenario 4.4: GHGE-cap on agricultural production and imports and generation of allowances through producing biofuels
4.4.5 Discussion on ETS
5 Summary and conclusion
References
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations
Annex 1 Base Solution
Annex 2 Process parameters and associated information
Annex 3 Lists of model variables, process parameters, equations and sets
Annex 4 Demand elasticities
Annex 5 Derivation of specific energy and protein demand of livestock
Annex 6 Further assumptions for the livestock sectors
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:16910 |
| Date | 20 December 2017 |
| Creators | Zech, Konstantin M. |
| Contributors | Althammer, Wilhelm, Schneider, Uwe, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds