This paper uses a quantitative content analysis informed by a critical realist framework to study the patterns of international political economy discourse prevalence within research articles concerning free trade. Once categorized, there are observable differences in the extent to which articles in the different categories address other discourses. Analyzing these patterns using concepts from discourse theory, we suggest that the liberal discourse constitutes a regime of truth to which the other discourses must relate. It is also found that articles published in higher ranking journals are less likely to address other discourses. We argue that this could be explained as being an effect of the larger readership of those journals.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:hj-36562 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Bohman, John, Malmrot, Henrik |
| Publisher | Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation, Högskolan i Jönköping, HLK, Globala studier, Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation, Högskolan i Jönköping, HLK, Globala studier |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds