Return to search

Chemistry, mineralogy, and grain properties at Namib and High dunes, Bagnold dune field, Gale crater, Mars: A synthesis of Curiosity rover observations

The Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover performed coordinated measurements to examine the textures and compositions of aeolian sands in the active Bagnold dune field. The Bagnold sands are rounded to subrounded, very fine to medium sized (similar to 45-500m) with 6 distinct grain colors. In contrast to sands examined by Curiosity in a dust-covered, inactive bedform called Rocknest and soils at other landing sites, Bagnold sands are darker, less red, better sorted, have fewer silt-sized or smaller grains, and show no evidence for cohesion. Nevertheless, Bagnold mineralogy and Rocknest mineralogy are similar with plagioclase, olivine, and pyroxenes in similar proportions comprising >90% of crystalline phases, along with a substantial amorphous component (35%15%). Yet Bagnold and Rocknest bulk chemistry differ. Bagnold sands are Si enriched relative to other soils at Gale crater, and H2O, S, and Cl are lower relative to all previously measured Martian soils and most Gale crater rocks. Mg, Ni, Fe, and Mn are enriched in the coarse-sieved fraction of Bagnold sands, corroborated by visible/near-infrared spectra that suggest enrichment of olivine. Collectively, patterns in major element chemistry and volatile release data indicate two distinctive volatile reservoirs in Martian soils: (1) amorphous components in the sand-sized fraction (represented by Bagnold) that are Si-enriched, hydroxylated alteration products and/or H2O- or OH-bearing impact or volcanic glasses and (2) amorphous components in the fine fraction (<40m; represented by Rocknest and other bright soils) that are Fe, S, and Cl enriched with low Si and adsorbed and structural H2O. Plain Language Summary The Bagnold dune field is an active sand field with moving dunes and sits between the landing site of the Curiosity rover and rocks of interest higher up on Mount Sharp. When passing through the dune field, we used all of Curiosity's instruments to measure the chemistry, mineralogy, and grain size of sands in the Bagnold dune field in order to figure out where they came from, how the sands are transported, and what volatile materials (like water) lie within Martian soils. We found that the Bagnold sand dunes are very well sorted; no dusty materials are found within them, in stark contrast to soils seen previously with Curiosity and with rovers at other landing sites. We found that the coarser sand grains are enriched in the volcanic minerals olivine and pyroxene, confirming a prediction from orbit that wind-related activity seems to concentrate these phases. We also found that the dunes were much lower in water and other volatile elements like sulfur and chlorine versus all previous Mars soils. Using a combination of the rover's sieving system and chemical measurement tools, we figured out that two types of materials host water. In the first type of material, common in these sands, water is low in abundance (similar to 1%), very tightly bound to the grains, and is not released until temperatures >200 degrees C. In the second type of material, water is higher in abundance (2%) and more easily released by heating. Sieved water-bearing fine materials may be a useful resource for human explorers.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/626565
Date12 1900
CreatorsEhlmann, B. L., Edgett, K. S., Sutter, B., Achilles, C. N., Litvak, M. L., Lapotre, M. G. A., Sullivan, R., Fraeman, A. A., Arvidson, R. E., Blake, D. F., Bridges, N. T., Conrad, P. G., Cousin, A., Downs, R. T., Gabriel, T. S. J., Gellert, R., Hamilton, V. E., Hardgrove, C., Johnson, J. R., Kuhn, S., Mahaffy, P. R., Maurice, S., McHenry, M., Meslin, P.-Y., Ming, D. W., Minitti, M. E., Morookian, J. M., Morris, R. V., O'Connell-Cooper, C. D., Pinet, P. C., Rowland, S. K., Schröder, S., Siebach, K. L., Stein, N. T., Thompson, L. M., Vaniman, D. T., Vasavada, A. R., Wellington, D. F., Wiens, R. C., Yen, A. S.
ContributorsUniv Arizona, Dept Geosci, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Malin Space Science Systems; San Diego California USA, Jacobs Technology; Houston Texas USA, Department of Geosciences; University of Arizona; Tucson Arizona USA, Space Research Institute-RAS; Moscow Russia, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science; Cornell University; Ithaca New York USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences; Washington University in Saint Louis; Saint Louis Missouri USA, Exobiology Branch; NASA Ames Research Center; Moffett Field California USA, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory; Laurel Maryland USA, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt Maryland USA, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; CNRS-Université Toulouse; Toulouse France, Department of Geosciences; University of Arizona; Tucson Arizona USA, School of Earth and Space Exploration; Arizona State University; Tempe Arizona USA, Guelph-Waterloo Physics Institute; University of Guelph; Guelph Ontario Canada, Department of Space Studies; Southwest Research Institute; Boulder Colorado USA, School of Earth and Space Exploration; Arizona State University; Tempe Arizona USA, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory; Laurel Maryland USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt Maryland USA, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; CNRS-Université Toulouse; Toulouse France, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; CNRS-Université Toulouse; Toulouse France, NASA Johnson Space Center; Houston Texas USA, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory; Laurel Maryland USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, NASA Johnson Space Center; Houston Texas USA, Planetary and Space Science Centre; University of New Brunswick; Fredericton New Brunswick Canada, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; CNRS-Université Toulouse; Toulouse France, Department of Geology and Geophysics; University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Honolulu Hawaii USA, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; Toulouse France, Department of Geosciences; Stony Brook University; Stony Brook New York USA, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées; Université de Toulouse; Toulouse France, Planetary Science Institute; Tucson Arizona USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA, Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie; CNRS-Université Toulouse; Toulouse France, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Los Alamos New Mexico USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
PublisherAMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
Source SetsUniversity of Arizona
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeArticle
Rights©2017. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.
Relationhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2017JE005267

Page generated in 0.0029 seconds