BACKGROUND: Static and dynamic dental implant guidance systems have established themselves as effective choices that result in predictable and relatively accurate dental implant placement. Generally, studies assess this accuracy using a postoperative CBCT, which has disadvantages such as additional radiation exposure for the patient. This pilot study proposed a scanbody-agnostic method of implant position assessment using intraoral scanning technology and applied it as an accuracy test of robotically assisted dental implant placement using the Neocis Yomi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the robotically assisted dental implant surgery was performed in the Postdoctoral Periodontology clinic at Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine. Completely edentulous patients were excluded. A total of eleven (11) implants were included in the study, eight (8) of which were fully guided. An optical impression of each implant position was obtained using a CEREC Omnicam (SW 5.1) intraoral scanner. Each sample used either a DESS Lab Scan Body or an Elos Accurate Scan Body as a means to indirectly index the position of the implant. A comparison of planned implant position versus executed surgical implant position was performed for each placement using Geomagic Control X software. Global positional and angular deviations were quantified using a proposed scanbody-agnostic method. Intraoral directionality of deviation was visually qualified by the author (D.K).
RESULTS: Mean global positional deviations at the midpoints of the top of each scanbody were 1.7417 mm in the partially guided samples and 1.1300 mm in the fully guided samples. Mean global positional deviations at the midpoints of the restorative platforms of each implant were 1.3142 mm in the partially guided sample and 1.27045 mm in the fully guided samples. Mean global positional deviations at the midpoints of the apex of each implant were 1.455 mm in the partially guided samples and 1.574 mm in the fully guided samples. Mean angular deviations were 3.7492 degrees in the partially guided samples and 2.6432 degrees in the fully guided samples.
CONCLUSION: Within the sample size limitations, robotically assisted dental implant surgery offers similar implant placement accuracy compared to published static and dynamic implant placement guidance systems. Intraoral optical assessment of dental implant position used in this study allows comparable analysis to other methods without requiring additional exposure to radiation and should be considered the default method of assessing guidance accuracy.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/44997 |
| Date | 11 August 2022 |
| Creators | Klass, Dmitriy, D.D.S. |
| Contributors | Price, Albert |
| Source Sets | Boston University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds