Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) present some application opportunities and
challenges that can be framed as learning problems. The performance of machine learning models
depends on algorithms and the data. Moreover, learning algorithms create a model of reality through
learning and testing with data processes, and their performance shows an agreement degree of their
assumed model with reality. ML algorithms have been successfully used in numerous classification
problems. With the developing popularity of using ML models for many purposes in different domains,
the validation of such predictive models is currently required more formally. Traditionally, there are
many studies related to model evaluation, robustness, reliability, and the quality of the data and the
data-driven models. However, those studies do not consider the concept of the applicability domain
(AD) yet. The issue is that the AD is not often well defined, or it is not defined at all in many fields. This
work investigates the robustness of ML classification models from the applicability domain
perspective. A standard definition of applicability domain regards the spaces in which the model
provides results with specific reliability.
The main aim of this study is to investigate the connection between the applicability domain approach
and the classification model performance. We are examining the usefulness of assessing the AD for
the classification model, i.e. reliability, reuse, robustness of classifiers. The work is implemented using
three approaches, and these approaches are conducted in three various attempts: firstly, assessing
the applicability domain for the classification model; secondly, investigating the robustness of the
classification model based on the applicability domain approach; thirdly, selecting an optimal model
using Pareto optimality. The experiments in this work are illustrated by considering different machine
learning algorithms for binary and multi-class classifications for healthcare datasets from public
benchmark data repositories. In the first approach, the decision trees algorithm (DT) is used for the
classification of data in the classification stage. The feature selection method is applied to choose
features for classification. The obtained classifiers are used in the third approach for selection of
models using Pareto optimality. The second approach is implemented using three steps; namely,
building classification model; generating synthetic data; and evaluating the obtained results.
The results obtained from the study provide an understanding of how the proposed approach can help
to define the model’s robustness and the applicability domain, for providing reliable outputs. These
approaches open opportunities for classification data and model management. The proposed
algorithms are implemented through a set of experiments on classification accuracy of instances,
which fall in the domain of the model. For the first approach, by considering all the features, the
highest accuracy obtained is 0.98, with thresholds average of 0.34 for Breast cancer dataset. After
applying recursive feature elimination (RFE) method, the accuracy is 0.96% with 0.27 thresholds
average. For the robustness of the classification model based on the applicability domain approach,
the minimum accuracy is 0.62% for Indian Liver Patient data at r=0.10, and the maximum accuracy is
0.99% for Thyroid dataset at r=0.10. For the selection of an optimal model using Pareto optimality,
the optimally selected classifier gives the accuracy of 0.94% with 0.35 thresholds average.
This research investigates critical aspects of the applicability domain as related to the robustness of
classification ML algorithms. However, the performance of machine learning techniques depends on
the degree of reliable predictions of the model. In the literature, the robustness of the ML model can
be defined as the ability of the model to provide the testing error close to the training error. Moreover,
the properties can describe the stability of the model performance when being tested on the new
datasets. Concluding, this thesis introduced the concept of applicability domain for classifiers and
tested the use of this concept with some case studies on health-related public benchmark datasets. / Ministry of Higher Education in Libya
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/18447 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Rado, Omesaad A.M. |
| Contributors | Neagu, Daniel |
| Publisher | University of Bradford, Faculty of Engineering and Informatics |
| Source Sets | Bradford Scholars |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis, doctoral, PhD |
| Rights | <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds