Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-10-22T12:31:48Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Roberto Rosio Figueredo.pdf: 874407 bytes, checksum: 74c72d7897266e683cb9bbe66467c77b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-10-22T12:31:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Roberto Rosio Figueredo.pdf: 874407 bytes, checksum: 74c72d7897266e683cb9bbe66467c77b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-09-04 / The interlocutory appeal, specifically as an appeal against interlocutory decisions rendered in the Courts, in relation to appeals to the Superior Courts, is a remedy widely used in forensic practice in Brazil, being truly rooted in our legal culture. However, over time, the interlocutory appeal has been subject of several and constant changes, because it is invariably related as one of the obstacles to a speedy judicial provision. Perhaps, therefore, legal practitioners often do not navigate quiet waters in dealing with the interlocutory appeal and its enforceability in court. The present work intends to help, both law practitioners and undergraduate law students, to better understand this recursal modality. In order to do so, care was taken to work on the topic in all its useful angles and questions applicable in our legal system. We have examined, through bibliographical and jurisprudential research, the historical evolution of exceptional resources and interlocutory appeals; the requirements for the admissibility of appeals in general as well as the specific aspects of the Extraordinary and Special appeals were closely monitored; and then went on to analyze each of the modes of interlocutory appeals in the superior courts, their procedures, judgments and effects, always emphasizing the most controversial issues, which are presented in the various interpretations formed in doctrine and jurisprudence, seeking to resolve doubts as to the practical and theoretical aspects of this remedy, specifically with regard to judgments in the Superior Courts. The purpose of this dissertation is to assist lawyers, judges, prosecutors and academics, who deal with legal matters, especially civil procedural law; so that the importance of our study of the constant changes in this area is justified in order to prevent them from becoming obstacles to a speedy judicial procedure. In order to concretize such scope, we opted for bibliographical and jurisprudential research, favoring a systemic approach that merges the historical study with the monographic one. Thus, the ultimate goal to be achieved will be to analyze the legal-procedural applicability of resources / O agravo, especificamente como recurso contra decisões interlocutórias proferidas nos Tribunais, é remédio amplamente utilizado na prática forense no Brasil, contudo, ao longo do tempo, tem sido alvo de diversas e constantes modificações posto que costuma estar relacionado a entraves e à celeridade da prestação jurisdicional e talvez, por isso, os operadores do direito, não se sintam à vontade ao lidarem com o agravo e sua aplicabilidade nos Tribunais. Este trabalho se propõe a auxiliar os operadores e acadêmicos do direito a melhor compreender esta modalidade recursal. Tomou-se o cuidado de trabalhar o tema sob todos os seus ângulos úteis na perspectiva do sistema jurídico-processual pátrio. Examinaram--se a evolução histórica dos recursos excepcionais e dos agravos; verificaram-se detidamente os requisitos de admissibilidade dos recursos em geral, bem como os aspectos específicos dos Recursos Extraordinário e Especial; posteriormente, passou-se à análise das modalidades de agravo nos tribunais superiores, seus procedimentos, julgamentos e efeitos, sempre enfatizando as questões mais controvertidas, procurando dirimir as dúvidas quanto ao tema, especificamente no tocante aos Tribunais Superiores. Assim, o objetivo desta dissertação é auxiliar os operadores do direito principalmente do processual; o que justifica pelas constantes alterações nesta seara de modo a evitar que se constituam em entraves a uma prestação jurisdicional célere. No intuito de concretizar tal escopo, optou-se pela pesquisa bibliográfica e jurisprudencial, privilegiando uma abordagem sistêmica que mescla o estudo histórico com o monográfico
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:leto:handle/21514 |
| Date | 04 September 2018 |
| Creators | Figueredo, Roberto Rosio |
| Contributors | Pinto, Nelson Luiz |
| Publisher | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, PUC-SP, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, instacron:PUC_SP |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds