Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-05-11T14:26:12Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_PAULO_THIAGO_FERNANDES_DIAS_PARCIAL.pdf: 793965 bytes, checksum: 6b187c3e0f0633990694e880f89aa7a2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-11T14:26:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_PAULO_THIAGO_FERNANDES_DIAS_PARCIAL.pdf: 793965 bytes, checksum: 6b187c3e0f0633990694e880f89aa7a2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-01 / This dissertation, linked to the Contemporary Legal and Criminal Systems line of research of the Graduate Program in Criminal Sciences stricto sensu of the Faculty of Law, is an expansive interdisciplinary, historical and in-depth study, concerning the unconstitutionality and unconventionality of how the adage in dubio pro societate incides into the judicial order, as a form of solving legal doubts as to the sufficiency of evidence as to criminal authorship and proof of materiality. Based on hermeneutical discussions, we seek to examine the decision-making act, notably in judicial analysis of the evidence produced by the parties. In this sense, the study found that such judicial protagonism, rather than providing fundamental rights protection, functions in fact, as a reminder of the inquisitorial culture to which the of Criminal Process Code of 1941 and much of the legal institutions that followed are linked. The adoption of the referred to adage as a decision-making standard for the solution of legal questions, violates the rule in dubio pro reo, or the presumption of innocence and human dignity, to the extent that it submits a person to trial, despite no certainty as to the minimum requirements for the delivery of the verdict. Finally, under the new Constitutional order established in 1988, and opening rules provided by paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 of Article 5, of the Federal Constitution, it is necessary to exercise conventional jurisdictional control of normative or judicial acts especially in the course of criminal proceedings. All of this occurs, within the continuing process of human rights internationalization of which Brazil is part of. Through a brief review, the study shows that despite all of the internal and external regulatory efforts to secure human rights, the Brazilian Judiciary, through its Superior Courts, has both systematically and massively been removing the presumption of innocence, in order to consecrate an incompatible adage to the founding values of the Republic. / A presente disserta??o, vinculada ? linha de pesquisa Sistema Jur?dico-Penais Contempor?neos do Programa de P?s-gradua??o stricto sensu em Ci?ncias Criminais da Faculdade de Direito, representa uma pesquisa expansiva e aprofundada, interdisciplinar, hist?rica sobre a (in)constitucionalidade e a (in)convencionalidade da incid?ncia do ad?gio do in dubio pro societate na decis?o de pron?ncia, como forma de solu??o da d?vida judicial quanto aos ind?cios suficientes de autoria e prova da materialidade delitivas. Com base em discuss?es de ordem hermen?utica, buscou-se analisar o ato decis?rio, notadamente no que pertine ? an?lise judicial das provas produzidas pelas partes. Nesse sentido, a investiga??o apurou que o protagonismo judicial, ao inv?s de proporcionar a prote??o dos direitos fundamentais, funciona, em verdade, como resqu?cio de uma cultura inquisit?ria da qual o C?digo de Processo Penal de 1941 e boa parte das Institui??es jur?dicas seguem vinculados. Al?m mais, a ado??o do ad?gio referido como standard probat?rio, para solu??o da d?vida judicial, viola, ao mesmo tempo, a regra do in dubio pro reo, enquanto decorr?ncia da presun??o de inoc?ncia, e a dignidade humana, na medida em que submete uma pessoa a julgamento, a despeito da n?o seguran?a quanto aos requisitos m?nimos para o proferimento da pron?ncia. Por fim, nos termos da nova ordem constitucional instaurada em 1988, e da abertura normativa proporcionada pelos ?2? e ?3?, do artigo 5?, da Constitui??o da Rep?blica, faz-se necess?rio o exerc?cio do controle jurisdicional de convencionalidade dos atos normativos e judici?rios, principalmente no bojo do processo penal. Trata-se, de um processo de internacionaliza??o dos direitos humanos do qual o Brasil se faz integrante. Em breve levantamento, a pesquisa demonstrou que, a despeito de todo o esfor?o normativo interno e externo para a valoriza??o dos direitos humanos, o Judici?rio brasileiro, por meio de seus Tribunais Superiores, vem, sistem?tica e maci?amente, afastando a presun??o de inoc?ncia para consagrar um brocardo incompat?vel com os valores fundantes da Rep?blica.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7261 |
| Date | 01 December 2016 |
| Creators | Dias, Paulo Thiago Fernandes |
| Contributors | Lopes J?nior, Aury Celso Lima |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 600, 600, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds