Research can conflict with conservation when invasive techniques are used on protected animal species. We developed a decision framework including the research question, the choice of technique, and the recommended course of action following the evaluation of the risks and benefits. This evaluation includes biological risks and benefits and considerations linked to the perception of resource users. We applied this framework a posteriori to a case study, the use of biopsy sampling on St. Lawrence belugas. We monitored the biological risks and benefits over four field seasons using behavioural and physiological indices and reports on the work in progress. We evaluated the risks as "low" and the benefits as "medium". For benefits to outweigh risks, procedures to minimise risks, publication of the work, and formulation of recommendations for conservation are essential. Researchers should be prepared to discuss with stakeholders the potential conflicts between their projects and conservation.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:QMM.21536 |
| Date | January 1998 |
| Creators | De la Chenelière, Véronik. |
| Contributors | Lefebvre, Louis (advisor) |
| Publisher | McGill University |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Coverage | Master of Science (Department of Biology.) |
| Rights | All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. |
| Relation | alephsysno: 001658973, proquestno: MQ50749, Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest. |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds