Wool is often being marketed as sustainable. However, when looking at LCA studies, results can be significantly different from one study to another and wool sometimes shows higher impacts than other fabrics. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this thesis aims at understanding the key environmental impacts of wool production and assessing the influence of main methodological choices on wool LCA results. In particular, the choice of the scope, allocation method and further considerations on water consumption and land use indicators have a great significance on the results of the studies. In order to provide with a fair representation of wool environmental impacts, the whole life-cycle should be taken into account, and methodological choices, such as the scope definition and allocation methods are to be clearly stated. The current tools that are the most widely used in the textile industry to rank fibres according to their sustainability performance are not suitable for wool due to unresolved methodological issues. Indeed, the impact categories that are taken into account in those tools are disadvantageous for wool compared to other alternative fibres, especially regarding water consumption and land use. This thesis also explores the construction of a single score based on the eco-costs of environmental impacts as a more suitable option to build a representative tool.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kth-247901 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Devaux, Caroline Alexandra |
| Publisher | KTH, Hållbar utveckling, miljövetenskap och teknik |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | TRITA-ABE-MBT ; 1931 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds