Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-01-14T20:24:00Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
AlexandreFerreiraDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2002356 bytes, checksum: 90f7932ad264ea9a8a5bcbd024ac2c36 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-01-19T20:46:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
AlexandreFerreiraDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2002356 bytes, checksum: 90f7932ad264ea9a8a5bcbd024ac2c36 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-19T20:46:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AlexandreFerreiraDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2002356 bytes, checksum: 90f7932ad264ea9a8a5bcbd024ac2c36 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-06-06 / Essa pesquisa apresenta uma an?lise dos aspectos e potencialidades dial?gicas presentes no
cinema document?rio. Procuramos identificar a utiliza??o dos elementos constitutivos da
linguagem audiovisual como forma de compreender a produ??o de sentido no document?rio.
Analisamos o cinema document?rio e sua constru??o numa perspectiva dial?gica. Para
constituir o corpus de nossa pesquisa selecionamos os documentaristas Bernardo Luiz, Mary
Land Brito e Paulo Laguardia e analisamos suas respectivas obras: Vivo, Sangue do Barro e
Cais do Sert?o, a fim de conhecer suas experi?ncias, estrat?gias e a??es durante o processo de
produ??o de um document?rio. Como escolha metodol?gica, utilizamos a fenomenologia e a
etnografia. Nossa reflex?o tem como subs?dio as experi?ncias dos documentaristas, os filmes
escolhidos para an?lise e as teorias sobre document?rio (LABAKI, 2005; LINS, 2008,
NICHOLS, 2005; PENAFRIA, 2009), cultura (HALL, 2003), dialogismo (BUBER, 2001;
FREIRE, 1987), comunica??o e media??o (MART?N-BARBERO, 1997) e leitura de
document?rio (ODIN 1984) / This research presents an analysis of the issues and dialogic potential present in documentary
filmmaking. We seek to identify the use of the elements of visual language as a way of
understanding the production of meaning in the documentary. We analyze the documentary
film and its construction in a dialogical perspective. To constitute the corpus of our research
we selected three filmmakers and their works (one of each) in order to know their experiences
and strategies and actions during the process of producing a documentary. Our reflection is to
grant the experiences of the filmmakers , the films chosen for analysis and theories of
documentary ( LABAKI , 2005; LINS , 2008 NICHOLS , 2005; PENAFRIA , 2009) , culture
(HALL , 2003) , dialogism ( BUBER 2001 , FREIRE , 1987) , communication and mediation
( MARTIN-BARBERO , 1997) and reading documentary ( ODIN 1984)
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/19625 |
Date | 06 June 2014 |
Creators | Santos, Alexandre Ferreira dos |
Contributors | 02482623863, http://lattes.cnpq.br/2258546985285753, Veloso, Maria do Socorro Furtado, 23755350220, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8254589050604215, Pahim, Renato Levi, 10555086860, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3528324524630751, Pavan, Maria Angela |
Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA M?DIA, UFRN, Brasil |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds