Four studies were conducted with the aim of developing a measure of narcissism
that, unlike previous measures, is not inherently pathological. In Study 1, the NPI—the
closest approximation to such a measure—was administered to a large-scale sample. Two
separate Principal Component Analyses (PCAs) failed to replicate its reported structure,
and revealed further psychometric problems. Use of an alternative item format (Likert
ratings) was shown to yield much higher reliabilities than the original forced-choice
format.
Using the Likert item-format, the Profile of Narcissistic Dispositions (POND) was
developed in Study 2. The items were based on a comprehensive analysis of the literature
on "normal" narcissism. Five reliable subscales emerged from an oblique factor analysis.
All five loaded substantially on the first unrotated principal component. The relationship
of the POND to established self-report measures was also explored. In Study 3, the
POND's structure was replicated and empirical relations were expanded: In particular,
the POND showed negative correlations with various self-reports of psychopathology.
In Study 4, the POND was shown to predict peer ratings of narcissism. Further
peer-ratings elaborated the character of normal narcissism, that is, an interpersonal style
that is marked by a dominant and secure but disagreeable social presence. / Arts, Faculty of / Psychology, Department of / Graduate
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/6207 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Taylor, Candace Margo |
| Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
| Format | 10899292 bytes, application/pdf |
| Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
Page generated in 0.0079 seconds