Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
CeciliaMMD_DISSERT.pdf: 1108017 bytes, checksum: 0766ea599363b6cce82cca9e7361e5ca (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-06-13 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / This research has the objective of studying the teacher-engineers awareness regarding their teaching practice of courses Civil, Electrical and Materials at the Federal University of Campina Grande. It presents and analyses major themes concerning the teaching work. At the same time, it pinpoints the need to develop good teaching practice in higher education. The study is based on the concepts of bricolage (KINCHELOE; BERRY, 2007) and multi-referentiality (ARDOINO, 1998). The Case Study procedure was adopted as an investigation strategy (YIN, 2004; AFONSO, 2005). The data collection was done through the application of questionnaires based on the teacher education paradigms (ZEICHNER, 1983; SACRISTAN, 1998; ALTET, 2001; BR?TTEN, 2008). The theoretical background for the thematic axis is oriented by reflections on university teaching (MASETTO, 2003; 2007; ZABALZA, 2004; CUNHA et al, 2005; GRILLO, 2008; PIMENTA; ANASTASIOU, 2010 ); on Engineering teaching (BAZZO, 2001; MASETTO, 2009) and on the present-day relationship between educational policies and higher education (MENEZES, 2001; SANTOS, 1995;2005; BOSI, 2007). The data analysis was done by means of a quantitative and qualitative approach (SAMPIERI; COLLADO; LUCIO, 2006), allow us to understand how the teachers surveyed live their professional activity. The results make it possible to generalize that the teacher-engineers give value to research as part of their teacher education and they view the university pedagogy as an important aspect to improve their practice. A considerable number of them is interested in being part of reflection groups, aiming to enhance teaching at higher education. The teacher-engineers dedicate themselves to university teaching without sharing their experience with other teachers, consolidating a present tendency seen in the international and national literature. They tend to apply a pedagogy originated from their daily teaching practice, because they believe that teaching is perfected through practice, though they admit that practice alone is not sufficient for professional development. In the view of most informants, good teaching requires willingness, along with the political element, the mastery of the lesson contents and familiarity with the discipline objectives, if we regard teachers as advisors in the educational process. Throughout the teaching process, the teachers use diversified pedagogical strategies, such as contextualization and exemplification of the lesson contents, epistemological basis in the scientific field, and group work. They do not share any bond of relationship between them and the students, though they consider it important. In general terms, they lack preparation for university teaching and no involvement or interest in institutional issues, by supporting and improving the teaching quality / Esta pesquisa tem por objeto de estudo conhecer a percep??o da pr?tica de ensino dos docentes-engenheiros dos cursos de Engenharia Civil, El?trica e de Materiais da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG). Apresenta e analisa temas importantes do trabalho docente sobre o ensino que desenvolvem. Paralelamente, identifica as necessidades para uma boa pr?tica na universidade. Do ponto de vista dos aportes te?rico-metodol?gicos, orientam o estudo conceitos como de bricolagem (KINCHELOE; BERRY, 2007) e de multirreferencialidade (ARDOINO, 1998). Como estrat?gia de investiga??o, adota-se o Estudo de Caso (YIN, 2004; AFONSO, 2005). O levantamento dos dados foi realizado atrav?s de question?rio padronizado fundamentado nos paradigmas formativos dos docentes (ZEICHNER, 1983; SACRISTAN, 1998; ALTET, 2001; BR?TTEN, 2008). O referencial te?rico dos eixos tem?ticos est? orientado pelas reflex?es sobre doc?ncia universit?ria (MASETTO, 2003; 2007; ZABALZA, 2004; CUNHA et al, 2005; GRILLO, 2008; PIMENTA; ANASTASIOU, 2010); sobre o ensino de Engenharia (BAZZO, 2001; MASETTO, 2009) e sobre as rela??es entre pol?ticas educacionais e ensino superior no contexto atual (MENEZES, 2001; SANTOS,1995; 2005; BOSI, 2007;). A an?lise dos dados, apoiada na abordagem quantitativa e qualitativa (SAMPIERI; COLLADO; LUCIO, 2006) nos permite entender como professores pesquisados vivenciam sua atividade de ensino. As conclus?es nos permitem generalizar num momento preliminar que valorizam a pesquisa como componente da forma??o docente e consideram a pedagogia universit?ria importante para aperfei?oar a pr?tica. Grande parte tem interesse em participar de grupos de reflex?o institucionais, visando ? melhoria da doc?ncia universit?ria. Dedicam-se ? pr?tica docente universit?ria sem partilhar com outros docentes, consolidando uma tend?ncia j? registrada na literatura internacional e nacional. Tendem a experimentar uma pedagogia da pr?tica constru?da no cotidiano, pois acreditam que a doc?ncia se aprende com a pr?tica, embora reconhe?am n?o ? suficiente para o desenvolvimento profissional. Na vis?o da maior parte dos sujeitos respondentes, para o exerc?cio da boa doc?ncia s?o necess?rios elementos inerentes ? atitude de boa vontade, aliados ao componente pol?tico, ao dom?nio do conte?do e ao conhecimento dos objetivos das disciplinas enquanto orientadores da forma??o discente. No exerc?cio da doc?ncia utilizam estrat?gias pedag?gicas variadas, como a contextualiza??o e a exemplifica??o dos conte?dos ministrados, a fundamenta??o epistemol?gica do campo cient?fico e o trabalho em grupo. N?o apresentam consenso quanto ao v?nculo estabelecido entre eles e os alunos, embora considerem importante a participa??o destes. Em temos gerais, manifestam uma aus?ncia da prepara??o para a doc?ncia universit?ria e pouco investimento e interesse, em termos institucionais, em dar apoio ao desenvolvimento da qualidade do ensino
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/14453 |
Date | 13 June 2011 |
Creators | Dantas, Cecilia Maria Macedo |
Contributors | CPF:67349331487, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4100091332162686, Lira, Andr? Augusto Diniz, CPF:02234433444, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8891017471432810, Mendes, Iran Abreu, CPF:12432962249, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4704236U8, Baldi, Elena Mabel Brutten |
Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o, UFRN, BR, Educa??o |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds