Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:13:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2006- Marcio Carneiro dos Reis.pdf: 2155427 bytes, checksum: 1a939de2b1ef8a8ff4048733d1ce79f9 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006-09-11 / Funda??o de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais / The aim of this study is to contribute towards understanding the historical processes and
towards conceiving strategies for the local development promotion proposing the inclusion of
the Subject s Space and of the Group s Space in the Map of the Structure-Action of the
Capitalist Societies in the World Space, by Boaventura Santos. The thesis that we try to
demonstrate is that the social spaces were increased with the historical transformations which
happened throughout last half century, amid the analysis of the passage of the national
development to the local development and also the analyses of the development
representations in the local plan. That expansion of the social spaces caused two effects: it
exposed the readings of the history which supplied subsidies for the conception of the
development strategies; and it turned the local spaces into privileged spaces to think about
development. Throughout that period, the analyses start to punctuate the local attributes, the
actors, their institutions and social relationships as a form to trigger local development. In
doing that, these analyses emphasize the families, the communities, production forms which
are not aimed at the market, forms of regulation of the social conflicts that are not embraced
by the rules originated from the Territorial State and international relationships that are not
limited to those established among National States and to the traditional flow of capitals and
of international trade, either. To be able to deal with such complexity and to demonstrate,
first, that the social spaces were increased and, then, that it is important to consider and that it
is possible to detect an space for the subject and an space for the social groups, amid the
expansion of those spaces, and that the perception of both it is important for the analysis of
the local historical processes, we opted for developing an argument that can be divided into
five parts: 1) to give evidence to the recent historical transformations that seem to us
important to the discussion here established; 2) to demonstrate how those historical
transformations exposed the reading of the inherent history to the theories of the development;
3) starting from those same theories, how to notice the social spaces increasing; 4) to
approach the problem of the local development starting from some theoretical contributions
that are devoted to the theme, in order to know if the increased social spaces have some
relevance and, if they do, how they are being dealt; and 5) to propose the inclusion of the
subject s space and of the group s space in the Map of Boaventura Santos' Structure-action.
The importance of the consideration of those two structural spaces for the discussions on local
development is due to the fact that: a) the subject was in evidence with the recent
transformations, in view of the individualization process in progress nowadays; and b) there is
no possibility of considering creativity of the social life without considering the subjective
aspects and inter-subjective that permeate people's relationships with themselves and the
relationships that they establish in the formation of the social groups. For this reason, to focus
only on the objective limits of the development may not be enough to provoke the triggering
of processes of local development, which should consider the inherent uncertainty to the
historical processes, as well as the plurality of roads. / O estudo objetiva contribuir para a compreens?o dos processos hist?ricos e para a formula??o
de estrat?gias de promo??o do desenvolvimento local propondo a inclus?o, no Mapa da
Estrutura-A??o das Sociedades Capitalistas no Espa?o Mundial, de Boaventura Santos, do
Espa?o do Sujeito e do Espa?o Grupal. A tese que procuramos demonstrar, em meio ? an?lise
da passagem do desenvolvimento nacional para o desenvolvimento local e das representa??es
do desenvolvimento no plano local, ? que os espa?os sociais se ampliaram com as
transforma??es hist?ricas ocorridas ao longo do ?ltimo meio s?culo. Essa amplia??o dos
espa?os sociais provocou dois efeitos: comprometeu as leituras da hist?ria que forneciam
subs?dios para a constru??o de estrat?gias de promo??o do desenvolvimento; e tornou os
espa?os locais espa?os privilegiados para se pensar o desenvolvimento. As an?lises, ao longo
desse per?odo, passaram a pontuar os atributos locais, os atores, suas institui??es e rela??es
sociais como forma de alavancar o desenvolvimento local. Ao caminharem nesse sentido,
enfatizam as fam?lias, as comunidades, formas de produ??o que n?o se encontram
direcionadas para o mercado, formas de regula??o dos conflitos sociais que n?o s?o abarcadas
pelas regras emanadas do Estado Territorial e rela??es internacionais que n?o se encontram
limitadas ?quelas estabelecidas entre os Estados Nacionais e nem pelo fluxo tradicional de
capitais e de com?rcio internacional. Para dar conta dessa complexidade e demonstrar,
primeiro, que os espa?os sociais se ampliaram e, depois, que ? importante considerar e que ?
poss?vel detectar, em meio ? amplia??o desses espa?os, um espa?o pr?prio do sujeito e um
espa?o pr?prio dos grupos sociais e que a percep??o de ambos ? importante para a an?lise dos
processos hist?ricos locais, optamos por desenvolver um argumento que pode ser dividido em
cinco partes: 1) evidenciar as transforma??es hist?ricas recentes que nos parecem relevantes
para a discuss?o aqui realizada; 2) demonstrar como essas transforma??es hist?ricas
comprometeram a leitura da hist?ria inerentes ?s teorias do desenvolvimento; 3) como, a
partir dessas mesmas teorias, podemos perceber os espa?os sociais se ampliando; 4) abordar o
problema do desenvolvimento local a partir de algumas contribui??es te?ricas que se dedicam
ao tema, para saber se os espa?os sociais ampliados v?m tendo alguma relev?ncia e, se sim,
como eles v?m sendo tratados; e 5) propor a inclus?o, no Mapa da Estrutura-A??o de
Boaventura Santos, do espa?o do sujeito e do espa?o grupal. A import?ncia da considera??o
desses dois espa?os estruturais para as discuss?es sobre desenvolvimento local est? no fato de
que: a) o sujeito ficou em evid?ncia com as transforma??es recentes, dado o processo de
individualiza??o que se encontra em curso; e b) n?o h? como considerar a criatividade da vida
social sem considerar os aspectos subjetivos e intersubjetivos que permeiam as rela??es das
pessoas com elas mesmas e das rela??es que elas estabelecem na forma??o dos grupos sociais.
Dessa forma, focar apenas os limites objetivos do desenvolvimento pode n?o ser suficiente
para provocar o desencadeamento de processos de desenvolvimento local, que deve
considerar a incerteza inerente aos processos hist?ricos, bem como a pluralidade de caminhos.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:tede/676 |
| Date | 11 September 2006 |
| Creators | Reis, Marcio Caneiro dos |
| Contributors | Maluf, Renato S?rgio Jamil |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Curso de P?s-Gradua??o em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade, UFRRJ, Brasil, Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0105 seconds