Expert software developer recommendation is a mature research field with many different techniques being developed to help automate the search for experts to help with development tasks and questions. But all previous research on recommending expert developers has had two constant restrictions. First, all previous expert recommendation work assumed that developers only demonstrate positive expertise. But developers can also make mistakes and demonstrate negative expertise, referred to as inexpertise, and show which concepts they don't know as well. Previous research on developer expertise hasn't taken inexpertise into account. Another restriction is that all previous expert developer recommendation research has focused on recommending developers for a single development task or expertise need, such as fixing a bug report or helping with a change request. But not all expertise needs can be easily classified into one of these groups, and having different techniques for every possible task type would be difficult and confusing to maintain and use. We find that inexpertise exists, can be measured, and that it can be used to direct inspection effort to find potentially incorrect or buggy commits. Additionally we investigate how different expertise finding techniques perform on a diverse set of long and short expertise queries and develop new techniques that can get more consistent cross query performance. / Master of Science
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/83505 |
| Date | 08 June 2018 |
| Creators | Claytor, Frank L. |
| Contributors | Computer Science, Servant Cortes, Francisco Javier, Edwards, Stephen H., Huang, Bert |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0068 seconds