The document offers a comparison of five literature management programmes - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, EndNote and JabRef. Versions as of 10/2021 were tested. The following criteria are taken into account: General and installation, import / export variants, data entry and editing, display and search, citation and bibliography, cooperation, knowledge organisation, special features and support. The comparison concludes with an overall assessment of strengths and weaknesses and provides target group-specific selection recommendations.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:76941 |
| Date | 17 January 2022 |
| Creators | Adam, Michaele, Arndt, Anna, Hoffmann, Kathleen, Seidel, Falk, Rahm, Sandra, Wenzel, Christina |
| Publisher | SLUB Dresden |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion, doc-type:Other, info:eu-repo/semantics/other, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-762961, qucosa:76296 |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds