Empirical findings on Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) have been mixed, despite early researchers' claims that BARS were superior to trait ratings and in reliability and resistance to leniency, central tendency, and halo. The study presented compared a BARS format to an independently derived trait scale as measures of secretarial and clerical performance. Though the BARS showed slightly inflated mean ratings, the instruments showed nearly identical variability. Neither demonstrated sufficient resistance to halo. Thus, despite their intuitive appeal and the rigors involved in format development, it did not appear in this instance that BARS were an efficient and psychometrically superior alternative to the traditional trait rating format.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc935571 |
| Date | 08 1900 |
| Creators | O'Connor, Suzan |
| Contributors | Johnson, Douglas A., Haynes, Jack A., Sininger, Rollin Albert |
| Publisher | North Texas State University |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | v, 31 leaves, Text |
| Rights | Public, O'Connor, Suzan., Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights |
Page generated in 0.0166 seconds