Truth and falsehood, questions and answers, construction and deconstruction; most things come in dual pairs. Duality is a mirror that reveals the new from the old via opposition. This idea appears pervasively in logic, where duality inverts "true" with "false" and "and" with "or." However, even though programming languages are closely connected to logics, this kind of strong duality is not so apparent in practice. Sum types (disjoint tagged unions) and product types (structures) are dual concepts, but in the realm of programming, natural biases obscure their duality.
To better understand the role of duality in programming, we shift our perspective. Our approach is based on the Curry-Howard isomorphism which says that programs following a specification are the same as proofs for mathematical theorems. This thesis explores Gentzen's sequent calculus, a logic steeped in duality, as a model for computational duality. By applying the Curry-Howard isomorphism to the sequent calculus, we get a language that combines dual programming concepts as equal opposites: data types found in functional languages are dual to co-data types (interface-based objects) found in object-oriented languages, control flow is dual to information flow, induction is dual to co-induction. This gives a duality-based semantics for reasoning about programs via orthogonality: checking safety and correctness based on a comprehensive test suite.
We use the language of the sequent calculus to apply ideas from logic to issues relevant to program compilation. The idea of logical polarity reveals a symmetric basis of primitive programming constructs that can faithfully represent all user-defined data and co-data types. We reflect the lessons learned back into a core language for functional languages, at the cost of symmetry, with the relationship between the sequent calculus and natural deduction. This relationship lets us derive a pure lambda calculus with user-defined data and co-data which we further extend by bringing out the implicit control-flow in functional programs. Explicit control-flow lets us share and name control the same way we share and name data, enabling a direct representation of join points, which are essential for tractable optimization and compilation.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uoregon.edu/oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/22659 |
| Date | 06 September 2017 |
| Creators | Downen, Paul |
| Contributors | Ariola, Zena |
| Publisher | University of Oregon |
| Source Sets | University of Oregon |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Rights | All Rights Reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds