Submitted by Yan Bernardes Vieites Castro dos Santos (yan.vieites@gmail.com) on 2017-08-10T14:56:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
The Prosocial Class - How Social Class Influences Prosocial Behavior (Versão Final).pdf: 1469168 bytes, checksum: b516c5d38bb18756e5b26eef64cd026d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by ÁUREA CORRÊA DA FONSECA CORRÊA DA FONSECA (aurea.fonseca@fgv.br) on 2017-08-10T16:23:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
The Prosocial Class - How Social Class Influences Prosocial Behavior (Versão Final).pdf: 1469168 bytes, checksum: b516c5d38bb18756e5b26eef64cd026d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-18T19:40:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
The Prosocial Class - How Social Class Influences Prosocial Behavior (Versão Final).pdf: 1469168 bytes, checksum: b516c5d38bb18756e5b26eef64cd026d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-07-19 / The concept of noblesse oblige establishes that the differential in privileges between the rich and the poor should be balanced by a differential in duties towards those in need. However, the empirical findings regarding which are the most prosocial groups havebeenascontroversialasthisassertive. Whereasresearchintheso-calledpsychological framework has advocated a negative relationship between social class and prosocial behavior, the economic approach has claimed the opposite (i.e., positive) direction to be true. This article sought to disentangle conflicting findings from these strands of research across two different studies. In the first study, we conducted a series of focus groups in both wealthy and impoverished areas. Results suggested that research in the domain of social class has been circumscribed to an almost conventionalized few prosocial behaviors that are not representative neither of wealthy nor of poor individuals. In the second study, we conducted surveys in the same areas. Results revealed that, despite having less resources and opportunities to help others, lower social class individuals are more prosocial than their upper-class counterparts. Furthermore, prosociality differences cannot be explained by a different pattern of targets of help across the social spectrum. Implications for practice and research on prosociality are also discussed.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:10438/18664 |
| Date | 19 July 2017 |
| Creators | Vieites, Yan |
| Contributors | Andrade, Eduardo Bittencourt, Cavazotte, Flávia de Souza Costa Neves, Escolas::EBAPE, Goldszmidt, Rafael Guilherme Burstein |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas, instacron:FGV |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds