In the domain of automatic speaker verification, one of the challenges is to keep the malevolent people out of the system. One way to do this is to create algorithms that are supposed to detect spoofed speech. There are several types of spoofed speech and several ways to detect them, one of which is to look at the glottal flow waveform (GFW) of a speech signal. This waveform is often estimated using glottal inverse filtering (GIF), since, in order to create the ground truth GFW, special invasive equipment is required. To the author’s knowledge, no research has been done where the correlation of GFW accuracy and spoofed speech detection (SSD) performance is investigated. This thesis tries to find out if the aforementioned correlation exists or not. First, the performance of different GIF methods is evaluated, then simple SSD machine learning (ML) models are trained and evaluated based on their macro average precision. The ML models use different datasets composed of parametrized GFWs estimated with the GIF methods from the previous step. Results from the previous tasks are then combined in order to spot any correlations. The evaluations of the different methods showed that they created GFWs of varying accuracy. The different machine learning models also showed varying performance depending on what type of dataset that was being used. However, when combining the results, no obvious correlations between GFW accuracy and SSD performance were detected. This suggests that the overall accuracy of a GFW is not a substantial factor in the performance of machine learning-based SSD algorithms.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:mdh-48414 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Deivard, Johannes |
| Publisher | Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0773 seconds