Contemporary theology is driven by a quest to make the doctrine of the Trinity
“relevant” to a wide variety of concerns. Books and articles abound on the Trinity and
personhood, the Trinity and ecclesiology, the Trinity and gender, the Trinity and
marriage, the Trinity and societal relations, the Trinity and politics, the Trinity and
ecology, etc. Recently a number of theologians have suggested that a doctrine of the
Trinity may provide the key to a Christian theology of religions. The purpose of this
study is to evaluate critically the claim that a proper understanding of “the Trinity”
provides the basis for a new understanding of religious diversity.
Drawing upon the trinitarian theology of Augustine (principally De Trinitate), I
critically examine the trinitarian doctrine in Mark Heim’s trinitarian theology of
multiple religious ends, Amos Yong’s pneumatological theology of religions, Jacques
Dupuis’ Christian theology of religious pluralism and Raimundo Panikkar’s trinitarian
account of religious experience (along with Ewert Cousins’ efforts to link Panikkar’s
proposal to the vestige tradition). My Augustinian assessment is structured around
three trinitarian issues in the Christian theology of religions: (1) the relationship of the
“immanent” and the “economic” Trinity, (2) the relations among the divine persons
(both ad intra and ad extra) and (3) the vestigia trinitatis.
In conversation with Augustine, I argue (1) that there is good reason to question
the claim that the “Trinity” represents the key to a new understanding of religious
diversity, (2) that current “use” of trinitarian theology in the Christian theology of
religions appears to be having a deleterious effect upon the doctrine, and (3) that the
trinitarian problems I document in the theology of religions also encumber attempts to
relate trinitarian doctrine to a variety of other contemporary issues including
personhood, ecclesiology, society, politics and science. I further argue that
contemporary theology is driven by a problematic understanding of what it means for a
doctrine of the Trinity to be “relevant” and that Augustine challenges us to rethink the
“relevancy” of trinitarian doctrine. / Dissertation
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DUKE/oai:dukespace.lib.duke.edu:10161/190 |
| Date | 04 May 2007 |
| Creators | Johnson, Keith Edward |
| Contributors | Wainwright, Geoffrey, Huetter, Reinhard, Smith, J. Warren, Carter, J. Kameron |
| Source Sets | Duke University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | 2177299 bytes, application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds