Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2018-03-06T20:47:26Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIEGO_GONCALVES_ DA_ SILVA_DIS.pdf: 929164 bytes, checksum: 0b9d5f73bda3144775889f93b4af7304 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-03-07T14:39:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DIEGO_GONCALVES_ DA_ SILVA_DIS.pdf: 929164 bytes, checksum: 0b9d5f73bda3144775889f93b4af7304 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-07T14:45:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIEGO_GONCALVES_ DA_ SILVA_DIS.pdf: 929164 bytes, checksum: 0b9d5f73bda3144775889f93b4af7304 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-06-27 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The pregnancy foods, drafted by Law 11.804/2008, consists of values provided by the alleged father whose main purpose is to guarantee the livelihood of the mother and the unborn child, dependents of the aid, given the risks of gestation. In spite of the relevance, it is not uncommon that the holder of rights of this nature to seek the Judicial system to implement them. Thus, the judicial process plays a decisive role, representing the last alternative for the achievement of the material right to food. In this scenario, in which life is at risk, the concession for temporary tutelage of urgency and its application in the gestational feeding lawsuit has high importance, and is indispensable that its exercise be carried out in accordance with the fundamental procedural rights of the parties. In this context, the present work aims to address the provisional tutelage of pregnancy foods lawsuit from the perspective of the fundamental rights of the parties, considering the object of the law discussed in claims of this kind, as well as the existing asymmetry between the parties that integrate this procedural relationship. Therefore, this dissertation is divided into two parts. At the first one, it is intended to contextualize the phenomenon of constitutionalisation of the process as a pillar to understand the process by the fundamental rights perspective, as well to approach the aspects related to pregnancy foods itself, analyzing the principles underlying Law 11804/2008, which regulates this very law, and peculiarities regarding it. In the second part, there will be a critical reading about the legal regime of the temporary tutelage of urgency in the action of pregnancy foods and their application in the light of the fundamental rights of the parties projections, namely: the inseparability of the judicial control, the right to the contradictory, to the proof, legal safety and the reasonable length of the proceedings. / Os alimentos grav?dicos, redigidos pela Lei 11.804/2008, consistem em valores prestados pelo suposto genitor cujo escopo principal ? o de garantir a subsist?ncia da genitora e do nascituro, dependentes do aux?lio, face aos riscos da gesta??o. Em que pese essa relev?ncia, n?o ? nada incomum que a titular de direito dessa natureza busque o Poder Judici?rio para concretiz?-los. Assim, o processo judicial assume papel decisivo, representando a ?ltima alternativa para a consecu??o do direito material de natureza alimentar. Nesse cen?rio, no qual o que est? em risco ? a vida, o instituto da tutela provis?ria de urg?ncia e sua aplica??o na a??o alimentar gestacional tem import?ncia elevada, sendo indispens?vel que seu exerc?cio ocorra em conson?ncia com os ditames dos Direitos fundamentais das partes. Dentro desse contexto, a presente disserta??o tem como objetivo abordar a tutela provis?ria de urg?ncia na a??o de alimentos grav?dicos na perspectiva dos direitos fundamentais processuais das partes, considerando o objeto do direito discutido em demandas dessa natureza, bem como a assimetria existente entre as partes que integram essa rela??o processual. Para tanto, a disserta??o est? dividida em duas partes. Na primeira, subdividida em dois cap?tulos, pretende-se contextualizar o fen?meno da constitucionaliza??o do processo como pilar para compreens?o do processo na perspectiva dos direitos fundamentais processuais, bem como abordar aspectos relativos aos alimentos grav?dicos, analisando os dispositivos da Lei 11.804/2008 que disciplina o direito em quest?o, bem como as peculiaridades que cercam a lei. Na segunda parte, subdividida em cinco cap?tulos, farar-se-? uma leitura cr?tica acerca do regime jur?dico da tutela provis?ria de urg?ncia na a??o de alimentos grav?dicos e sua aplica??o ? luz de proje??es dos direitos fundamentais das partes, quais sejam: a inafastabilidade do controle judicial, o direito ao contradit?rio, ? prova, ? seguran?a jur?dica e a dura??o razo?vel do processo.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7873 |
| Date | 27 June 2017 |
| Creators | Silva, Diego Gon?alves da |
| Contributors | Reichelt, Luis Alberto |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 500, 500, 500, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds