1952年Markowitz 提出平均數－變異數投資組合模型（Mean-Variance Model，簡稱MV 模型）後，開創了投資組合理論的先河，他認為風險與報酬是影響資產配置的兩大因素，其中Markowitz在估計共變異數矩陣時，使用樣本共變異數矩陣模型（Sample Covariance Model）做運算。雖然MV 模型具權威性，但仍存在估計誤差的問題，因此許多共變異數矩陣的估計方法應運而生，包括Litterman and Winklemann（1998）的高盛衰退率共變異數矩陣模型以及Ledoit and Wolf（2003）的單一指數濃縮估計法。本文比較各種共變異數矩陣的效率前緣（efficient frontier）；並採用全域最小變異組合（Global Minimum Variance Point），檢驗樣本共變異數矩陣模型、高盛衰退率共變異數矩陣模型及單一指數濃縮估計法所建構的投資組合，其績效是否優於市值加權的台灣50指數；且以滾動視窗（rolling window）方式，比較三種方法績效之異同優劣。本研究實證結果顯示三種方法相對於大盤均有較佳表現，各方法間則以單一指數濃縮估計法表現較佳。 / Markowitz indicated Mean-Variance Model and initiated the portfolio theory in 1952. He proved that risk and return are two important components to impact on asset allocation, and used sample covariance model to calculate covariance matrix. However, MV model exists estimation error. Therefore, many covariance matrix methods was proposed including Goldman Sachs decay rate covariance matrix model of Litterman and Winklemann（1998）, and shrinkage to single-index covariance matrix method of Ledoit and Wolf（2003）. This study compares the efficient frontier build by different covariance matrix methods. Also, this study adopts global minimum portfolio and rolling window to discuss performance of portfolio constructed by these three methods. The conclusion is that the performance of portfolio constructed by these three covariance matrix methods is better than market index, and shrinkage to single-index covariance matrix is the best method to construct portfolio.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G1003510371 |
| Creators | 葉冠廷 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds