One major objective in radiation oncology is the personalisation of cancer treatment. The implementation of this concept requires the identification of biomarkers, which precisely predict therapy outcome. Besides molecular characterisation of tumours, a new approach known as radiomics aims to characterise tumours using imaging data. In the context of the presented thesis, radiomics was established at OncoRay to improve the performance of imaging-based risk models. Two software-based frameworks were developed for image feature computation and risk model construction. A novel data-driven approach for the correction of intensity non-uniformity in magnetic resonance imaging data was evolved to improve image quality prior to feature computation. Further, different feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms for time-to-event survival data were evaluated to identify suitable algorithms for radiomics risk modelling. An improved model performance could be demonstrated using computed tomography data, which were acquired during the course of treatment. Subsequently tumour sub-volumes were analysed and it was shown that the tumour rim contains the most relevant prognostic information compared to the corresponding core. The incorporation of such spatial diversity information is a promising way to improve the performance of risk models.:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical background
2.1. Basic physical principles of image modalities
2.1.1. Computed tomography
2.1.2. Magnetic resonance imaging
2.2. Basic principles of survival analyses
2.2.1. Semi-parametric survival models
2.2.2. Full-parametric survival models
2.3. Radiomics risk modelling
2.3.1. Feature computation framework
2.3.2. Risk modelling framework
2.4. Performance assessments
2.5. Feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms
2.5.1. Feature selection methods
2.5.2. Machine learning algorithms
3. A physical correction model for automatic correction of intensity non-uniformity
in magnetic resonance imaging
3.1. Intensity non-uniformity correction methods
3.2. Physical correction model
3.2.1. Correction strategy and model definition
3.2.2. Model parameter constraints
3.3. Experiments
3.3.1. Phantom and simulated brain data set
3.3.2. Clinical brain data set
3.3.3. Abdominal data set
3.4. Summary and discussion
4. Comparison of feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms
for radiomics time-to-event survival models
4.1. Motivation
4.2. Patient cohort and experimental design
4.2.1. Characteristics of patient cohort
4.2.2. Experimental design
4.3. Results of feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms evaluation
4.4. Summary and discussion
5. Characterisation of tumour phenotype using computed tomography imaging
during treatment
5.1. Motivation
5.2. Patient cohort and experimental design
5.2.1. Characteristics of patient cohort
5.2.2. Experimental design
5.3. Results of computed tomography imaging during treatment
5.4. Summary and discussion
6. Tumour phenotype characterisation using tumour sub-volumes
6.1. Motivation
6.2. Patient cohort and experimental design
6.2.1. Characteristics of patient cohorts
6.2.2. Experimental design
6.3. Results of tumour sub-volumes evaluation
6.4. Summary and discussion
7. Summary and further perspectives
8. Zusammenfassung
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:34254 |
| Date | 18 June 2019 |
| Creators | Leger, Stefan |
| Contributors | Löck, Steffen, Böhme, Hans-Joachim, Craft, David, Technische Universität Dresden |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0163 seconds