Regimes of tropical low-level clouds are commonly identified according to large-scale subsidence and lower tropospheric
stability (LTS). This definition alone is insufficient for the distinction between regimes and limits the comparison of low-level clouds from CloudSat radar observations and the ECHAM5 GCM run with the COSP radar simulator. Comparisons of CloudSat radar cloud altitude-reflectivity histograms for stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regimes,
as defined above, show nearly identical reflectivity profiles,
because the distinction between the two regimes is dependent
upon atmospheric stability below 700 hPa and observations above 1.5 km. Regional subsets, near California and Hawaii, for example, have large differences in reflectivity profiles than the dynamically defined domain; indicating different reflectivity profiles exist under a given
large-scale environment. Regional subsets are better for the
evaluation of low-level clouds in CloudSat and ECHAM5 as there is less contamination between 2.5 km and 7.5 km from precipitating hydrometeors which obscured cloud reflectivities.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa.de:bsz:15-qucosa-177436 |
| Date | 25 August 2015 |
| Creators | Nam, Christine C. W., Quaas, Johannes |
| Contributors | Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie,, Universität Leipzig, Institut für Meteorologie, American Geophysical Union (AGU), |
| Publisher | Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | doc-type:article |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | Geophysical research letters (2013) 40, S. 4951-4956 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds