Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-01-18T15:47:00Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoD???OliveiraVieiraDissertacao2017.pdf: 1779168 bytes, checksum: d6dd88417a306d42ae749db19beb77ac (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-01-18T15:47:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoD???OliveiraVieiraDissertacao2017.pdf: 1779168 bytes, checksum: d6dd88417a306d42ae749db19beb77ac (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-18T15:47:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoD???OliveiraVieiraDissertacao2017.pdf: 1779168 bytes, checksum: d6dd88417a306d42ae749db19beb77ac (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-11-21 / This study aims to make an analysis of the extended confiscation pending in Congress. To face
that issue, the structure of the Draft Law n?? 4.850/2016 (DL) and the evolution of the institute
in comparative law from de Merida and Palermo Conventions and the United Nations
Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances to the current
consolidation with the Directive 2014/42/EU are presented. Portugal was selected as parameters
for analyzes the draft because of the similarity. The conclusion, in the view of the study,
indicates some imperfect approach on DL 4.850/2016 regarding the definition of the evidential
standard, the reversal of the burden of proof, the negative points of the proceeds chosen burden
of proof and finally to forecast state agency specialized for the specific purpose of performing
equity research. The Draft is in line with international guidance when presenting the list of
crimes that allow extended confiscation application. / O presente trabalho pretende analisar a proposta legislativa de confisco alargado pendente de
aprecia????o no Congresso. A estrutura do Projeto de Lei n?? 4.850/2016 (PL) e a evolu????o do
instituto no Direito Comparado, desde as Conven????es de M??rida, de Palermo e das Na????es
Unidas contra o Tr??fico de Entorpecentes at?? a atual consolida????o com a Diretiva 2014/42/UE
s??o estudadas. Portugal foi selecionado para a proposta legislativa em raz??o da aproxima????o do
projeto legislativo em discuss??o no Congresso. A conclus??o, na ??tica do estudo, indica o
desenvolvimento insuficiente no PL n?? 4.850/2016 quanto ?? defini????o do standard probat??rio,
?? invers??o do ??nus da prova, ?? dificuldade do rito escolhido para a execu????o do novo
instrumento e ?? aus??ncia de previs??o de especializa????o de ??rg??o estatal com o objetivo
espec??fico de realizar a investiga????o patrimonial. O Projeto segue em linha ?? orienta????o
internacional ao apresentar o rol de crimes que permitem o confisco alargado.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2337 |
| Date | 21 November 2017 |
| Creators | Vieira, Roberto D???Oliveira |
| Contributors | Cordeiro, Nefi |
| Publisher | Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito, UCB, Brasil, Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB, instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília, instacron:UCB |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds