Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2016-10-11T20:49:20Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2015 - Roberta de Souza Campos.pdf: 1458484 bytes, checksum: 00d38317e9fafb94c6c0ed2aff6157a4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-11T20:49:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2015 - Roberta de Souza Campos.pdf: 1458484 bytes, checksum: 00d38317e9fafb94c6c0ed2aff6157a4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-09-28 / The changes experienced in Rio de Janeiro in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, from a political and economic point of view, reverberated deeply on indigenous communities living near the city. It occurred not only because the indigenous legislation was amended with the Pombalino Directory and later suspended losing its general characteristic for the entire colonial/national territory, but also because land disputes became increasingly common in the life of these populations. In this context of intense changes, indigenous places like Itaguai and Mangaratiba experienced intricate situations regarding the relations of power, labor and land rights. From a regional history, we seek to highlight a double movement: one by the bias of the State and non-indigenous society and the other by the bias of the indigenous themselves. That is, on the one hand, we describe the hegemonic
movement that seeks to assimilate, mix and produce free and dependent work labor between
the so called civilized indigenous; while on the other hand, we describe a counter-hegemonic
movement that seeks to stay, re-invent and produce a new historical culture, which helped the group identity processes and political interests. / As mudan?as vividas pelo Rio de Janeiro no final do s?culo XVIII e no in?cio do XIX, dos pontos de vista pol?tico e econ?mico, reverberaram com profundidade sobre as comunidades ind?genas que viviam pr?ximas ? cidade. N?o somente porque a legisla??o indigenista foi modificada, com o Diret?rio Pombalino e depois com a suspens?o do mesmo, perdendo seu car?ter geral para todo o territ?rio colonial/nacional, mas tamb?m porque
conflitos agr?rios se tornavam cada vez mais cotidianos na vida dessas popula??es. Nesse contexto de intensas transforma??es, lugares ind?genas como Itagua? e Mangaratiba vivenciaram situa??es intrincadas no que diz respeito ?s rela??es de poder, ? m?o de obra e aos direitos territoriais. A partir de uma hist?ria regional, buscamos destacar um movimento duplo: um pelo vi?s do Estado e da sociedade n?o-ind?gena e outro pelo vi?s dos pr?prios ?ndios. Isto ?, de um lado, descrevemos o movimento hegem?nico que busca assimilar, misturar e produzir m?o de obra livre e dependente entre os ?ndios ditos civilizados; por outro
lado, descrevemos um movimento contra-hegem?nico que busca permanecer, reinventar e produzir uma cultura hist?rica nova, que auxiliou nos processos identit?rios de grupo e em interesses pol?ticos.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/1284 |
| Date | 28 September 2015 |
| Creators | CAMPOS, Roberta de Souza |
| Contributors | Moreira, V?nia Maria Losada, Ribeiro, M?nica da Silva, Apolin?rio, Juciene Ricarte |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Hist?ria, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Ci?ncias Humanas e Sociais |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds