Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:33:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
437302.pdf: 120309 bytes, checksum: 50c4664d57a0f710e5af5eaf5a8f29db (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-01-05 / Conflicts of collective nature have gained space in modern society and therefore class actions have become a necessity of our times as they enable access to justice and allow the composition of legal disputes and ensure a more effective jurisdictional activity. In what concerns a broadening of the legitimacy and nonrestrainability of judicial appreciation, it has been granted infra-constitutional legitimacy to Public Defenders through the ope legis system adopted in Brazil, so that they can seek in Court protection of such public and collective rights. However, it is a controversial matter that of constitutional relevance of legal protection of such collective rights, and in relation to this it is argued that it would not pertain the Public Defenders prerogatives abilities other than assistance to the financial needy, and an economic analysis of the litigants would remain prejudiced in class actions. Fact is, regardless of the transfer of individual civil suits institutes to class actions, the latter has its own peculiarities and that alone requires different treatment. It is, furthermore, a powerful tool for facilitating access to justice for the aggrieved, which have difficulties due to the peculiar qualities of the involved parties and the collective nature of the dispute. On the other hand, as it will be shown, the Federal Constitution does not restrict the Public Defender prerogatives only to the institutional care of the financially needy given that there are many other difficulties and obstacles that must be overcome to ensure the access to justice, especially regarding collective rights. The interpretation of constitutional precepts must be in harmony with the guarantee system arranged by it. Hence, the constitutional rule that assigns the Public Defenders the protections of collective rights is perfectly approved and integrated with the constitutional text and context. / Os conflitos individuais v?m cedendo espa?o ? conflituosidade coletiva e, por conseguinte, os processos coletivos v?m se tornando uma necessidade da sociedade moderna para viabilizar o acesso ? justi?a, a composi??o das lides e a efetividade da atividade jurisdicional. No sentido de abertura da legitima??o e da inafastabilidade do controle jurisdicional, para tutela desses novos direitos foi outorgada legitimidade ativa concorrente ? Defensoria P?blica atrav?s da legisla??o infraconstitucional, na forma do sistema ope legis adotado pelo Brasil. Entretanto, ? mat?ria controvertida a pertin?ncia constitucional da legitimidade na tutela coletiva, sob o argumento de que ? Institui??o caberia apenas a assist?ncia aos financeiramente necessitados e eventual an?lise econ?mica restaria prejudicada na lide coletiva. Fato ? que, mesmo diante da a importa??o de institutos do processo individual, o processo coletivo possui peculiaridades pr?prias, como a legitimidade pr?pria, e que destoam das lides individuais, o que reclama tratamento diferenciado. Constitui, outrossim, um poderoso instrumento de facilita??o de acesso ? justi?a para os lesados, que t?m a dificuldade natural gerada pela qualidade da parte e pela natureza da lide coletiva. De outra banda, conforme se demonstrar?, a Constitui??o Federal n?o restringe a assist?ncia institucional exclusivamente aos financeiramente hipossuficientes, pois h? in?meras outras dificuldades e empecilhos que devem ser superados para garantir o acesso ? justi?a, em especial no direito coletivo. A interpreta??o do dispositivo constitucional deve ser realizada em conson?ncia com o sistema de garantias por ela institu?do. Assim, a legisla??o constitucional que atribui ? Defensoria P?blica a tutela dos direitos coletivos se encontra perfeitamente recepcionada e integrada com o texto e o contexto constitucional.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4172 |
| Date | 05 January 2012 |
| Creators | Prado, Larissa Pilar |
| Contributors | Porto, S?rgio Gilberto |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 500, 600, 2194221341323903125 |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds