Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-06-03T18:32:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_RAFAEL_MARTINS_COSTA_MOREIRA_PARCIAL.pdf: 606007 bytes, checksum: 451f60d5dfa099e9f6d47044755a0d44 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-03T18:32:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_RAFAEL_MARTINS_COSTA_MOREIRA_PARCIAL.pdf: 606007 bytes, checksum: 451f60d5dfa099e9f6d47044755a0d44 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-16 / This dissertation initially analyzes new trends in Public Administration and Administrative Law. It then presents a succinct study of decision theory in general, its applicability to administrative decisions, the administrative activity proceduralization, and, finally, it is proposed a concept of administrative decision. After referring to the notions of discretion and binding, its place in public decisions and outlining the features of the new discretion, this work deals with the legal and factual motivation of administrative decisions: the difference between reason and motivation, the main grounds for the requirement of motivation and valid motivation requirements. The text also deepens the study on the sustainability principle and establishes the mandatory observance of sustainable choices by the public authorities and its duty of intertemporal motivation. After settling these points, the dissertation focuses on the judicial review of sustainability of administrative decisions. Firstly, it is presented an explanation of the control of the Public Administration as a whole, which is then specified through judicial review: its concept, rationale, scope, possibilities and limits. References are made to the progress of judicial control, the importance of the proportionality principle applicable to administrative decisions and the interpretation also based on the consequences, especially for the control of motivation and the deference principle, in brief comparison to the US Law and a proposal for the Brazilian Law system. It also approaches the effectiveness of judicial protection in regard to relations in the Public Administration. Finally, it is undertaken an analysis of the application of the concepts and tools developed for the appreciation of the parameters for the judicial review of sustainability of public procurement, regulation, and the timely use of prevention and precautionary measures that have been or should have been taken by the Public Administration. / A presente disserta??o, inicialmente, analisa as novas tend?ncias da Administra??o P?blica e do Direito Administrativo, em especial a sustentabilidade. Em seguida, ? realizado sucinto estudo da teoria da decis?o em geral, sua aplicabilidade ?s decis?es administrativas, a procedimentaliza??o da atividade administrativa e, por fim, ? sugerido um conceito de decis?o administrativa. Ap?s referir as no??es de discricionariedade e vincula??o, sua localiza??o nas decis?es p?blicas e tra?adas as caracter?sticas da nova discricionariedade, o trabalho se dedica ? motiva??o f?tica e jur?dica das decis?es administrativas: a diferen?a entre motivo e motiva??o, os fundamentos principais para a exig?ncia da motiva??o e os requisitos da motiva??o v?lida. O texto tamb?m aprofunda o estudo sobre o princ?pio da sustentabilidade, estabelece a obrigat?ria observa??o pela Administra??o P?blica por escolhas sustent?veis e o dever de motiva??o intertemporal. Definidos esses pontos, a disserta??o ingressa no controle judicial de sustentabilidade das decis?es administrativas. Primeiramente, ? feita exposi??o sobre o controle da Administra??o P?blica em sentido amplo, depois especifica com o controle judicial: seu conceito, fundamentos, extens?o, possibilidades e limites. S?o desenvolvidas refer?ncias sobre a evolu??o do controle judicial, a import?ncia do princ?pio da proporcionalidade aplic?vel ?s decis?es administrativas, a interpreta??o baseada tamb?m nas consequ?ncias, com destaque para o controle da motiva??o e o princ?pio da defer?ncia, em breve compara??o com o direito norte-americano e proposta para o sistema jur?dico brasileiro. A efetividade da tutela jurisdicional incidente sobre as rela??es da Administra??o P?blica tamb?m ? tratada. Por derradeiro, empreende-se na aplica??o dos conceitos e instrumentos desenvolvidos ? aprecia??o dos par?metros para o controle judicial de sustentabilidade das licita??es e contrata??es p?blicas, da regula??o e da tempestividade das medidas de preven??o e precau??o que foram ou deveriam ter sido tomadas pela Administra??o P?blica.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6747 |
| Date | 16 March 2016 |
| Creators | Moreira, Rafael Martins Costa |
| Contributors | Freitas, Juarez |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds